POP PHILOSOPHY: Is Lady Gaga the new avante-garde?

Ryan Carey dissects the artistry of Lady Gaga, wondering if she's avant-garde or just a brilliant self promoter.

0 comments

POP PHILOSOPHY: Is Lady Gaga the new avante-garde?

POSTED: Wednesday, May 25, 2011, 4:00 PM

Filed Under: Music

In the world of pop tunes, presentation is arguably more about the "product" than the music. In that respect, there's almost no question that Lady Gaga is pushing boundaries. Unless of, course, you count Marilyn Manson as a pop star. But, as you know, he doesn't make pop music, he makes industrial Goth. What Gaga lacks in being an originator, she makes up with doing it in a far less adventure-ready arena. But courageousness aside, can we really call Lady Gaga a member of the avant-garde?

According to freedictionary.com, avant-garde is "A group active in the invention and application of new techniques in a given field, especially in the arts." So if the given field is pop music — which we're cynically defining as the packaging of a singer for mass consumption — then, yes, we can say that at least part of what Lady Gaga does is completely new. But is it actually a technique? Or is it just the glorification of flinging stuff at the wall because the market is ready for it? Let's look at the definition of "technique.":

Technique (n): "The systematic procedure by which a complex or scientific task is accomplished."

I don't know whether Gaga's procedure can be called systematic. Hell, I don't even know if we can call it a procedure. This ain't Claude Monet developing more exaggerated brush strokes of light and shadow to render a stylized impression of landscapes. If anything, the Gaga shtick seems to flourish by virtue of it's sharply asystematic, WTF appeal.

Is it rebellion that Germanotta taps into? If so, then why does she keep the music so effortless? Remember, the music is still part of the equation and if she wanted to be really rebellious, she would have stayed with her earlier rock or hip-hop songwriting instead of re-tooling Madonna and Michael Jackson for an easy swallow by the masses.

I guess that "m" word really explains it. Lady Gaga knows how to feed the machine with tunes necessary for pop universality. She knows that fashion, photography and music videos are far more avant-garde mediums for the bizarre or unusual. But music? Not so much. That's the key to pop song success: instant familiarity. It's why the same four-chord structure comprises half of the songs you hear on the radio. The ear and the eye are such different animals. The eye is hungry for more data. The ear wants to maintain the status quo. Why do you think alarms are so ... alarming? Evolutionarily, the ear "stood watch," protecting us from predators and rival tribes. The eye worked on hunting, learning and reproducing. The eye is the offensive squad, and the ear is the defense. Ever hear someone listening to really weird music and then joke that they're on drugs? The phrase, "you have to be high to enjoy Phish" is not entirely un-scientific. When music has too much color, complexity and other variables, our primal ear turns off. Illicit substances, for better or worse, are known to boost the visual qualities of our other senses. By the same token, have you ever honestly been thrilled by looking at a picture of a tree in a field? BORING! I've seen that like a thousand times by now! Show me something interesting, like melting clocks drooping off the side of a mesa!

But I digress. Lady Gaga is not an avant-garde artist, she's a marketer. She certainly meets the standard of an "artist" by expressing herself in a way that could change how you look at the world. But her strategy of connecting unusual sights to the same old sounds is nothing short of a marketing strategy. She's a shrewd businesswoman, a supposedly postmodern creatrix whose craft is the attachment of contrasting packages in order to increase demand for the "product."

I tell you what she is, though, is "active in the invention and application of new techniques in a given field," but that field is making millions, not shedding light on the inner life of the world. Unless of course marketing is an elaborate — and coincidentally profitable — performance piece about the human condition...

Oh. And for the record, I love Lady Gaga.

Posted by Ryan Carey @ 4:00 PM Permalink | Post a comment

0 comments

Comments (0)

PHILLY LOVE NOTES: An ode to Spruce Street
ICE CUBE: In Memoriam: Joe Tartaglia
Q&A with SHARI SOLANIS: "The goal isn't pornography"
CONCERT REVIEW & PHOTOS: James Blake @ TLA 5/11
SEXY TIME Q&A: I've never had an orgasm during sex with a man — and I'm 30!
Coming soon to Philly: Two cockamamie movie promotion schemes
What we're trying to do this weekend
Q&A with Tony Goldwyn: "Life is gray, and relationships are, too"
CONCERT REVIEW: Primus (3D & quadraphonic sound) @ The Tower 10/17
CITY PAPER WRITING CONTEST 2013: Send stories! Send poetry!

About this blog

Featuring everything from event roundups to concert reviews and sex talk, City Paper's Critical Mass is a space for off-the-wall coverage of Philly's A&E scene.

Follow Critical Mass editors Patrick Rapa and Emily Guendelsberger on Twitter:

@mission2denmark | @emilygee

Search this blog:

Topics:

Blog archives:

May
April
March

February
January

Past Archives: