Comcast picks up ESPN 3-D
The Web site for the award-winning alternative weekly, the Philadelphia City Paper.
Comcast picks up ESPN 3-D
Filed Under: TV
![]() |
| 3d-tv-technology.com |
| This is not what my home theater system looks like. |
There seems to be a belief that 3-D films are not getting their money's worth unless they hurtle objects or body parts at the audience. Every time that happens, it creates a fatal break in the illusion of the film. The idea of a movie, even an animated one, is to convince us, halfway at least, that that we're seeing on the screen is sort of really happening. Images leaping off the screen destroy that illusion.Granted, when it comes to sports on TV, you don't need to be convinced the action you're watching is real because, well, it is. But will you be that much more invested in a game if the ball is flying right at you while you sit on your couch wearing stupid glasses? Seriously, sports fans, I wanna know so tell me in the comments. If anything, it's a distraction, breaking down the communal experience of drinking a Lager and watch the Phillies pummel whoever they are playing. Also, most of what I watch on TV I don't want to see in 3-D. Believe me, I don't need to feel any closer to Michael Scott than I already do. And while a show like Planet Earth would be amazing in 3-D, watching in it 2-D is pretty badass in and of itself. Going back to Ebert's point, will 3-D serve to make the real look more, for lack of a better word, unreal? At the same time, this could be great for people like me. One of Ebert's points is that when the movie industry feels threatened, it reverts back to technology to this idea that you can't get a theatrical experience anywhere but a theater. Now that 3-D television exists and like HD or BluRay will at some nebulous time in the future be a big ticket item, Hollywood can't make that claim and they'll stop berating me with all of this 3-D crap. Although, with the recent FCC ruling that studios will now be allowed to bypass theatrical releases and send movies directly to people's homes, maybe they won't. So what do you guys think? Would you spring for a 3-D TV if it wasn't crazy expensive? Am I just a Luddite who needs laser eye surgery? Have at it in the comments below.
I'm holding out for 4D.
I can't wait to see Lee Corso in 3D!!!
Comments (0)
Popular Posts
Search this blog:
Topics:
- Activism
- Arts
- Arts Events
- Books
- Dance
- First Person Fest
- Last Chance
- Museum
- On the Fringe
- Philly Artists
- The Curator
- Theater
- Visual Art
- Arts News
- Artist Profile
- Arts Preview
- Street Art
- Been There, Done That
- Big Ups
- Comedy
- LOL With It
- Stand-up
- Critical Mass
- DVD
- Events
- Friday Fill-in
- Ice Cubes
- In Memoriam
- Interview
- Just Do It
- Just Opened
- Kaleidoscopic
- LGBTQ
- Art Phag
- Mailbag
- Movies
- Film Fest
- Movie Review
- On set
- Scenester
- screening
- trailer!
- Music
- 10 Track Mind
- Album
- Album Review
- Concert Review
- DJs
- Local Support
- Now Hear This
- One Track Mind
- Philly Bands
- Show
- Somebody Else Was There
- Song
- The Showdown
- concert photos
- jazz
- DJ Nights Blogged
- Night Watch
- Now See This
- Poetic License
- Printed Matter
- Radio
- Shopping
- Coveted
- Fashion
- What We Heart
- TV
- 24
- Idol Hands
- Mad Men
- ProjRun
- True Blood
- Useless Lost Recaps
- Couch Potato
- Shore Trash
- Turned ONN
- TopMod
- Video Games
- Free Online Game
- PSP
- PlayStation 2
- The 1-Upper
- Wii
- Web Junk
- CAGE MATCH
- Free Online Toy
- Weekend Omnibus
- Win





