Interview

POSTED: Monday, August 9, 2010, 10:09 PM
Filed Under: Interview | Movies screening
The Kashmere Stage Band
Filmmaker Mark Landsman was sitting in his office in L.A. listening to NPR when he heard the Kashmere Stage Band for the first time. Along with many other listeners that day, he assumed the band was a professional funk band from the '70s. That is, until the reporter said they were 15 and 16 year old high school kids. That was all Landsman needed to hear. He decided then and there that the world needed to know the entire story of the Kashmere Stage Band from Houston, Texas and their celebrated teacher/composer Conrad 'Prof' Johnson who was convinced they were good enough to compete in various festivals. The result is Landsman's Thunder Soul, which screens at International House on Tue., Aug. 10, spans over 30 years chronicling the beginnings of the band in the '70s to their 2008 reunion show to honor Johnson. The day after the screening Landsman will lead a workshop at Scribe Video Center titled "From Pitch to Premiere" because obviously the man knows a good story when he hears one. City Paper: What were you thinking when you heard the NPR broadcast? What was your next step after hearing it? Mark Landsman: Basically [Kashmere Band's] teacher, Prof, was interviewed on that broadcast and he was telling the story of the band, how he broke the color barrier back in the day and how they were the first high school band to actually play funk. As he was telling the story I thought this would actually make an incredible movie. That same day I looked up every Conrad Johnson in the Houston phone book and came up with four. I called the first one and it was actually his son. He said 'This is Conrad Johnson Jr., you want Conrad Johnson Sr." So he gave me Prof's phone number. I was so nervous that I had the right number because I wanted to do it so badly but I waited a week to get up the courage to call him. And then when I called him he was like "What's your problem, man? I've been waiting all week for you to call." So I then I hopped on a plane to Houston and sat with him and we talked about a possibility of making a film about his life. CP: When you actually sat down with Prof did you know how you wanted the film to look or how you wanted it to be organized? ML: No. I actually went into this whole thing to talk to Prof about optioning the rights to his story to tell it as a fictional scripted film. But then when I got there I met all these people, including Craig who is a former member of Kashmere Stage Band, one of the original members. And he said "I don't know if you know this or not but we are going to be planning this reunion." I was like, "Wow, that's better than I could've imagined!" Basically at that point I went back to Los Angeles and pitched the project to a couple producers here. I mentioned that this reunion was happening and that I wanted to do a documentary and they said 'Go, do it.' We are actually now making a fictional version of the material but the reunion is what really took me initially. CP: What did it feel like to know you caught this story when you did, in such a pivotal time in Prof's life and the story of the band? ML: For me that's the power of documentary film. If you do a documentary you have no idea what's going to happen and, basically, your screenwriter is life. You can't predict it. We could have never predicted that they were going to do this reunion at this particular time and all the kind of profound things that happened over the course of them getting back together and performing. It's stuff you can't script. It's almost too good to script. For me it was totally affirming as a documentary filmmaker. It's why we do what we do. We capture these moments that are really extraordinary and a lot of it is good fortune, being in the right place at the right time. I would always tell people with this particular project that there's a higher hand here. There are other forces at play.
CP: In terms of unpredictability and being in the right place at the right time. Was there anything really difficult about filming it? ML: Prof had a heart attack a week before the show and then there was the question of whether or not he's going to make it. Obviously you will see the movie and find out what happens but Prof was unbelievable. Prof, at 90 years old, was walking around and totally active, this total dynamo. He was a powerhouse. Up until a week before the show, once he fell ill he, was still playing saxophone every day. He was still tutoring kids and teaching them how to play music. That's the most amazing thing about this man, the guy taught for like decades, up into his 90s he was still teaching. CP: There's a moment in the film when the band first gets back together and after 30 years of not playing they don't think they have it in them to play anymore. What was it like watching them as they struggled to get back into it? ML: It was like watching an amazing underdog story. I love those kinds of films where you don't know if they're going to make it or not and you're totally rooting for them to make it. I had great faith in them because when we turned on our cameras to film the first rehearsal and I heard some of the musicians' caliber I was like 'This is going to be awesome!" I mean even though they were a little rusty I still recognized right away that they would pull together. It was obviously particularly profound because the whole reason they were doing this reunion now is because they wanted to honor Prof while he was still alive. They wanted to let him know in the most profound way that they could, which was through his music, that they loved him and that he meant everything to them. These people who were kids back in the seventies now in their 50s just totally rallying coming from as far as Portugal back to Houston, Texas to do this. To me that was just so powerful—if you're going to come halfway around the world to honor your teacher, that's so rare. CP: I think that says a lot about music education in schools. ML: That's the whole thing: If people can come away from this movie feeling like music and arts education for kids is special then we've done what we've set out to do. It was a very key underlying goal for the movie, for people to realize this is just as important as anything else a kid can learn from school — how to express themselves through music and art. Prof was really keen on that. Kashmere High School was fairly mediocre high school. It was not performing so well in any department. But once the band started winning these contests — and it happened pretty quickly they really started to dominate. They were so much better than all these other bands. That filled this incredible pride in the school and all these other departments started to rise. Suddenly the football team is winning and the basketball team is going to state and you've got kids performing better academically than they've seen in years before. It had this incredible ripple effect in the school. It's an essential part of a child's experience, being exposed to music and art.
CP: Since you worked with the band so closely, do you have a favorite Kashmere Band song? ML: Hmm ... let me open my iTunes. Let's see ... best Kashmere song. I'm gonna...(funk music comes on in background). This is a really hard question. I'm gonna say "Zero Point." It's so fucking awesome.
Thunder Soul
, Tue.. August 10, 7 p.m., $5-$10, International House, 3701 Chestnut St., 215-387-5125, ihousephilly.org. From Pitch to Premiere, Wed., August 11 7 p.m., $20, Scribe Video Center, 4212 Chestnut St., 215-222-4201, scribe.org.
Posted by Lauren Macaluso @ 10:09 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
POSTED: Saturday, July 17, 2010, 6:08 PM
Filed Under: Interview | Movies
Courtesy of Lucas Entertainment
Michael Lucas
Allow me to tell you about Michael Lucas, film maker and founder of Lucas Entertainment, who will talk about his life in porn during tonight's Lip Service lecture at QFest. After growing up Jewish in bigoted Soviet Russia, Lucas immigrated to America and opened his vid-making and distributing venture. The adult film star — who has previously voiced controversial views on Islam, including referring to the Qu'ran as "today's Mein Kampf" — has lectured at universities and film forums regarding rampantly destructive drug use and unprotected sex in the gay community, Israel and anti-Semitism and child pornography. We got him to open up about a few of these topics before heading to Philly. City Paper: Before your time in the limelight, did you feel more persecuted for being gay, an atheist or a citizen of Israel? Michael Lucas: I was born in Russia, and I lived in Russia until 1995. I went to Europe after and lived there from 1995 to '97. Then I came to New York and started my company in 1998. I became an American citizen in 2004. I became an Israeli citizen in 2009. I am a citizen of three countries: Russia, America and Israel. I am also a resident of Germany because I lived there before coming to the United States. I'm giving you this quick outline in order to be able to answer your questions. So, about being atheist. I couldn't possible have a problem with being an atheist because in the Soviet Union, where I grew up, you had no other alternative. After the fall of the Soviet Union, Russia became as religious as the United States is today. I'm still an atheist because I don't believe in the supernatural and I don't believe in God. I don't believe that God created us. I believe that people created God out of their weakness, being afraid to live, and most importantly, being afraid of dying. As for discrimination, I was discriminated in the Soviet Union for being a Jew. In Russia, "Jewish" was not a religion. It was considered a nationality. In my passport under the space for nationality, it was entered "Jewish," not "Russian." It's ridiculous, but that's how anti-Semitic Russia was. As for being gay, it was difficult being gay because Russia is a very homophobic country. Those are two of the reasons I left: Russia is very homophobic and anti-Semitic. It's a dark and cruel country. I would like to clarify for you that I consider myself to be a Jewish-atheist. If it sounds complicated, I'd be happy to elaborate. CP: Let the layman in on the mechanics of it all? ML: Jews you see are not just people that follow Judaism. There are many secular Jews. I don't believe in a Jewish god. I believe in my people, I believe in Israel. I am proud that for thousands years of persecutions, discriminations, pogroms and massacres that culminated in Holocaust. We survived and contributed to the world in every field. I believe in Israel, in our right to defend ourselves — to make sure not to be exterminated again. Israel is a back-up for every Jew no matter where he lives. CP: Do you think of yourself as a filmmaker who happens to work in gay pornography or decidedly a gay pornographer. I mean, I'm not gay and find your more narrative moments interesting. ML: Thank you very much for that compliment. I do believe that I'm a pornographer. But in order to stay in business for over 15 years, one has to be creative. So I think I'm creative. CP: Thinking about your ideas regarding Islam and knowing you're a proud New Yorker, how do you feel about the building of a mosque near Ground Zero? ML: I think it's a slap in the face of all Americans and, in particular, New Yorkers and the families of those who died in the terrorist attacks of 9/11. Because you see, people are not stupid. No one is buying the bullshit that Muslims are trying to rub in our faces when they call a 13 floor Islamic center a gesture of peace. This project is sponsored by Saudi Arabia, the country that provided 15 hijackers for the attacks. Muslims are incredibly stupid for being so arrogant and disrespectful. They're turning public opinion even more against themselves. As for politicians in Manhattan, they are nothing more than a bunch of liberal morons for approving this disgusting monument to terrorism. CP: You seem to have lectured around the country on a number of topics. You obtained a law degree from Russia, is that the lawyer in you? ML: No. This is independent thinking, one which is not intimidated by anyone. CP: You have a pretty great relationship with the TLA people and its QFest. How did all that start and where is it going as so much film is downloadable. ML: TLA was always great to me. They distribute lots of my films, and we have a fantastic relationship. As downloading, it's a big problem for studios that produce movies and for distributors like TLA. We're all hoping that some serious measures will be taken to prevent illegal downloading, because it hurts not only the porn business, but the music business, the show business and lots of other industries overall. People are becoming thieves without even understanding it, and I think governments of the world should interfere.

Lip Service, Sat., July 17, 9:45 p.m., Ritz East Theater, 125 S. Second St., qfest.com; Michael Lucas: Ultraporn After-Party, 10 p.m., Voyeur, 1221 St. James Pl.

Posted by A.D. Amorosi @ 6:08 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
POSTED: Friday, July 16, 2010, 5:00 PM
Filed Under: Interview Books
"Without memorable characters, a good story fades like sunburn. Philly resident Justin Kramon's beach-perfect debut, Finny, is full of unforgettable oddballs — from a narcoleptic pianist to a digestively challenged father who claims he's 'brushing his teeth' every time he rushes off to the bathroom — all of whom Kramon spends plenty of time with. That way, he says, 'all of that character's funny little habits and obsessions have a warmth to them, like you're coming home.'" That's what I wrote in this week's Kaleidoscope about Finny, the most refreshing summer novel I've read in a long time. In conjunction with his book's Tuesday debut, I asked Kramon a few questions about how he tore his characters down, how he built them up and why Philly plays such an important role in his work. City Paper: What strikes me most about Finny is its broad scope — 360-page books don't often span this many decades of storyline. Can you tell me about why you made the decision to tell Finny's story so epically? Justin Kramon: I got the idea for Finny from reading a bunch of coming-of-age books I love: The World According to Garp, The Adventures of Augie March and especially David Copperfield. I loved these big stories, the sense of adventure, the humor and just the feeling of wonder I got from these books. One thing I noticed, though, was that most of these raucous, epic-style adventures of young people coming into the world are about young men. So I was interested in what it would be like to tell this classic story from the point of view of a young woman coming into the contemporary world. I wanted to ask myself what would be the big adventures and meaningful moments for this kind of character. Also, there's a special way that novels can capture the movement of time, and I love when novels follow characters over a long time. You get to know everyone better, and when you return to a character, all of that character's funny little habits and obsessions have a warmth to them, like you're coming home. I wanted readers to feel like they were living in the world of the book, and experience the same sense of enchantment I had with the novels I've loved.
Random House, July 13
CP: In the book, Earl plays a supporting role to Finny's narration. Who do you relate to more, Earl (whose connections to you might be more tangible, since you're both writers — and both male) or Finny (the main character, who, despite being female, has universal qualities of spunk and brazenness)? JK: I feel connected to both Finny and Earl (and to [Finny's brother] Sylvan, too). I like to have a connection to all the main characters in a piece I'm writing, or else I feel like it's easy to short-change them, make them seem petty or small. But I do have a special feeling for Finny. The book came alive as soon as she stepped onto the stage. She made me laugh in those early quirky dinner scenes with her family, and she also has a wonderful ability to cut through people's pretensions. I think that's something I enjoy about writing from a woman's point of view in general, the way it allows me to step outside of myself. If I'm writing about a relationship or a friendship or sex, I think I can bring up some more useful observations by cutting myself out of the equation. It's easy to take your own temperature when you're writing, but I'm not sure my readers would be interested in that. I borrow aspects of different characters from my own life. I can understand some of Earl's feelings about writing, and some of Finny's feelings about being misunderstood, and some of Sylvan's feelings about wanting to do something meaningful with his life but not knowing how. But seeing the world through Finny's eyes allowed me to bring a humor and warmth to everything in the novel, and it allowed me to think about the world from a different angle, and maybe bring up some shortcomings in the male point of view. In that way, writing let me become a better version of myself. Not that Finny is noble or good all the time. But she brought some wisdom and perspective to a lot of issues and situations I've wondered about. CP: Your characters are lovably quirky: Finny's dad spends his life quoting famous men and "brushing his teeth"; her boarding-school principal chews on pencils and shouts constantly; her friend Judith is the consummate unreliable narrator; and Earl's father is a narcoleptic piano player. What's your process for developing these characters' eccentricities? Are they based on folks you know, serious people-watching sessions or something else entirely? JK: Sometimes characters are simply people I'd like to meet or who interest me — or even people I hope I'll never meet. I never write someone from my life directly into a story, which is something I'm sure my friends and family are happy about. But there are times when I'll borrow a trait or situation, and maybe shift it or amplify it a little bit to help me build a character. That's something that Dickens is famous for, and that style was a big influence in this book. You mentioned the principal of Finny's boarding school, Mrs. Barksdale. She came from an experience I had when I was working as a cater-waiter in New York, just before I started writing Finny. I was hired by a company who asked me to attend an unpaid training session in their kitchen. The whole session consisted of the owner talking about how great his company was and how much better it was than other companies, and every time he'd brag about something, he'd look at his assistant – this poor, overworked woman – and say, "Isn't that right, Edna?" And she would have to agree with everything this bozo was saying. It was annoying to be subjected to this, but later on, when I was writing Finny, I thought it would be funny to have Finny's principal have a similar relationship with her secretary, Ms. Simpkin. They both pump up each other's egos in this silly way, but in the novel, what had been annoying to me became funny in Finny's eyes. It let me say something real about powers and ego, but in a way that was entertaining and consistent with the bright tone of the book. CP: Finny is surprisingly sensual at times, which I guess makes it an even more enticing summer read. However, the book's sexier moments are more of a nice surprise than an expectation fulfilled, since the book isn't billed as steamy so much as a coming-of-age story. Was this intentional? JK: I always want to write sex scenes with the same level of detail as I write everything else. I think it's easy to be overly vague or overly detailed about sex, especially when you start thinking about it as separate from the rest of life. But I think Finny is mature enough to see it as a part of the jumbled pleasures and sadness of life. It would have been a disappointment to see so much of the world from Finny's quirky perspective, and not to take that same humor and pathos and understanding to sex, which I think is a part of most people's lives, if not everyone's. To be honest, I hadn't really thought about the sex in the book until early reviewers started mentioning it. It felt like the only honest way to write the book. CP: Finny experiences a lot of loss in her life, which brings a melancholy tone to the novel. Why is it important that Finny carries so many burdens throughout the years? Does it make her a more credible and relatable narrator? Or is it a vehicle for redemption? JK: A sad truth about writing a novel is that you're always looking for ways to make life hard for your characters. Not that you always want them to fail, or to have everyone around them dying. But you're always challenging them, always seeing how they'll act when times get a little tough. I feel like that's part of what makes a good story. There can be triumphs and joys; but I think there have to be challenges. In a way, I think that love is actually the biggest challenge for Finny — as much as the deaths and betrayals and disappointments. Finny starts out the book as such a defiant, independent young woman, and I think that it's always interesting when someone like that falls in love, because suddenly she's dependent on another person. Being true to that, while also being true to herself, is something she struggles with throughout the book. Also, I do think the hardships get a little more serious as Finny gets older. There's a whimsy and fun to the book, but that gets tempered with age and experience — deaths, illnesses, break-ups. I feel like that aspect, the way life shifts and deepens, is something that's true to my experience of the world. CP: How important was it for you to incorporate Philly into your story, since you live here? I appreciate the fact that you don't beat us over the head with local references. JK: It was very important to me to get Philly into the story, since both Finny and I have spent a good deal of time here. When I write about a place, my goal is always to get the feeling of the place into the work, as much as the details of street names and restaurants and local expressions. I don't do a huge amount of research for my writing. Factual accuracy isn't one of my great strengths as a writer (or person). I try to get feelings I've had about people I've met or places I've lived into a story that hopefully says more about the world than the truth ever would.
Justin Kramon reads from Finny Sun., Aug. 1, 3 p.m., free, Big Blue Marble Bookstore, 551 Carpenter Lane, justinkramon.com.
fran schumer
Posted 2010-08-02 13:01:39
Justin -- I especially loved this interview. Fran Schumer (McNulty), colleague at Gotham. And I'm so glad I'm connected to your website.
Posted by Carolyn Huckabay @ 5:00 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
POSTED: Friday, July 16, 2010, 4:00 PM
Filed Under: Interview | Movies screening
[source]
Alex DiPhillipo filming Thomas Petriken
A handful of South Jersey friends surf together each winter. The water is empty. The ocean is cold. It's a lonely scene — just a few people crazy enough to go the distance for some great waves. Alex DiPhillipo saw a story. Margate native DiPhillipo decided to document the unique experience of Jersey surfers, many of whom are his friends. Originally, DiPhillipo, who moved to Hawaii after college and shot footage for various surf companies, thought his first independent film would be small and wrap quickly. But as more people took interest, it became clear the project was growing. The film doesn't just feature Jersey local hotshots such as Zack Humphreys and Andrew Gesler. Surfing pro Kelly Slater and NJ native Dean Randazzo appear in the film. But the famous names don't mean as much as the local ones. DiPhillipo's film, Dark Fall, is about what it's like to be a New Jersey surfer, with none of the glory, but all of the guts. City Paper: What's the concept of the film? Alex DiPhillipo: It takes you through the seasons and what it's like to be a New Jersey surfer. It shows the hardships of being a surfer from New Jersey, a professional trying to make a living. There really aren't many contests here, there isn't that much recognition. We surf in the snow — it's pretty hardcore. The film also takes you to Hawaii. We meet up with a bunch of big name guys in Hawaii to show everyone we can surf pipeline, some of the world's biggest waves. We come back to New Jersey in the summer, show you how it's a crazy tourist attraction, how the Jersey Shore goes from a ghost town in the winter to a crazy party scene in the summer. Then we take another break from Jersey and go to Tahiti. It ends in the fall. That's the basis of film: coming back to Jersey to surf the fall, with nobody around but your friends.
CP: Most of the subjects were your friends. Did that make the project any easier? AD: Andrew Gesler, who takes you through the film with his voice and surfs a lot in it too — he's co-producer of the film and wrote the film with me. Basically, when I came home and said I wanted to do a film, he gathered guys I didn't know for me. That was a big help. If it weren't for him, a lot of the guys in there wouldn't be in there. I knew most of the guys. But [Gessler] wrote to the pros and said, "Hey, you gotta hop on this." It took some awhile to believe in it for a couple of months but when we started producing stuff, like little trailers, people saw what we had. CP: Obviously, there are some great surf movies out there, and you just made your own which is a huge undertaking. But what are your three favorite surfing movies of all time? AD: I don't have three but I have one. I definitely liked Endless Summer. I grew up on that film. I'm a big fan of story telling; the reason I made this film was to tell a story. There's a lot of quote on quote "surf porn" out there — which is just like surfing and techno music. Anyone can go to a beach and film the best surfers in the world doing crazy shit. But that movie was really one of the first movies I watched when I was younger and I watched it over and over again, because of the story, you know?
Dark Fall, Fri. July 16, $20 House of Blues, 801 Boardwalk, Atlantic City, 609-236-2583, darkfallthemovie.com
Posted by Katy Bergen @ 4:00 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
POSTED: Friday, July 2, 2010, 2:00 PM
Filed Under: Interview | Movies
Fox Searchlight
John C. Reilly in Cyrus
John C. Reilly's fly is totally open. We're talking about his new movie, Cyrus (read Shaun Brady's review), and my eyes happen to wander down to his crotch-al region, and there I can that see his open button fly. Oh crap, I think. Do I say something? To him? To his publicist? What if my eyes do deceive me and it's not open at all? Cool it, Eichel, this makes total sense: It's John C. Reilly, the consummate Mr. Cellophane, one of the foremost actors to play innocent man-children who just want to lead a good, happy life but hit roadblocks along the way. And that's exactly what Reilly plays in Cyrus. He just wants to date Marisa Tomei's transcendent Molly. It's his first big romantic move after a divorce seven years ago and he's finally found someone who will drunkenly sing the Thompson Twins with him at a party. But there's a problem: Molly's got a 21-year-old son — the title character, played by Jonah Hill — who wants nothing to do with Reilly's affable fuckup. So I let it go. I don't tell John C. Reilly that I think his button fly is open. Because that's the way it should be. City Paper: You've talked about how the movie changed based on your perceptions of your character, which is how I've heard the Duplass brothers work. Do you have any examples of how the movie was changed from the page to what you see on screen? John C. Reilly: The story generally held together in the same way. But it was more like the tone of things. One example is there's a scene early on after [Marisa Tomei and I] have slept together, I invite her to over the house and I cook dinner for her. Originally what was written in the scene is I cook dinner for her and then she comes over two hours later than she said she was going to come over and I'm disappointed. I'm sort of miffed that she's late even though she never said what time she was going to come over. I said, "Guys, this is not the way to have a first date. Even if the person is late, you look the other way." They were like, "Yeah, you're right. This is stupid, why would he be mad?" It became this romantic moment where asks her if she thinks its working and whether we can make a go of it early on. It became one of the first of many vulnerable moments for them. CP: Because the Duplass brothers work on the fly, purposefully keeping their shoots fast and loose, how do you prepare for that? How did that change how you normally work? Especially after you got into the swing of how things were going to move. JR: My only preparation for this movie was feeling, "OK, what do I need to do to prepare today?" And honestly, most of the days, I would feel like I just have to prepare to feel totally unprepared. You just have to kind of get yourself into a good mood and get the creative juices flowing and keep your mind open. Just let go and surrender to the moment and forgive yourself for not being prepared. That was the same way with the directors, too. They would say, "Look, it would feel better for us to say, 'We know exactly what we're doing. Here's what we're going to do today.'" And that's what the crew especially expects from them. What are we doing today? Literally, why have you brought us here? What is it we're going to shoot? A lot of times they would say, "We don't know and we don't want to know. We want to turn the cameras on and discover what's going on between you." Of course, using the script as a guideline and some guidance from us. That really gives the movie the quality that it has. You see us discover these little beats, these moments in real time on camera. CP: So, you're this guy who criticizes Marisa Tomei and her son, but you have a similarly inappropriate relationship with on-screen ex-wife Catherine Keener, because you also leach off of her. Every time this guy has a problem, he runs to his ex-wife. JR: That's true. Everyone in this movie has problems with boundaries, I'd say, but you know, she's not feeding me my lunch with a spoon. That's funny because that's something a lot of people point out. That relationship between you and your ex-wife is not appropriate either. It's not appropriate for her husband, certainly. He's sick of having me around. It's more truthful for a lot of people than you might think. Friends are hard to find, even though you have a different history in your past, you tend to hold on to people. But yeah, it's a little dysfunctional. The cool thing about this movie is that when people do things that are slightly inappropriate or needy, they're doing them from a place of love. Even Jonah's character, who is doing these devious, manipulative things to try to break up me and Marisa, he's doing it because he loves his mother and he's afraid of separating from her. It's a really a interesting movie in that way. There are no evil intentions behind anyone's weird behavior. Everyone is looking for love in one way or another. CP: Branching off your relationship with Jonah in the film, when you played against him in Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story, it was supposed to be funny; you're expecting the laugh. But in this movie, you laugh at these moments that you never really expect to laugh at. JR: I didn't really worry too much about that. I wasn't thinking, while making Cyrus, "What style of comedy is this?" I wasn't looking at any playback or dailies. I wasn't looking at photographs or anything. I was just trying to be there in the moment. The truth is, most good actors don't consider themselves dramatic actors or comedic actors, they just consider themselves vessels for whatever the character is. So if you really commit yourself to being there in the moment and playing truthfully what is going on in the scene, if the circumstances are ridiculous then you're in a comedy. If the circumstances are more serious, then you're in a dramatic thing. You're not like 'Oh, I know what I'll do! I'll use Gesture #23 — a tried and true comedic gesture!' You're just trying to be honest, you know? And then the comedy kind of takes care of itself itself if its meant to be funny. CP: You have this theater background, where you need to act based on the size of the room. But the Duplass' camera work is all really close. JR: With them, and this was true when I worked with Robert Altman, you kind of forget where the cameras are. You're encouraged to work in this way where you just ignore the camera altogether, which you kind of should anyway. Most movies, if the camera's stationary, you can't just get up and walk around. With Altman and with this movie, the cameras are so free-flowing that you just stop worrying about it. They'll let me know if I'm out of the frame. I just have to keep going and connecting with the character. There's a great kind of joy and freedom in that. You don't have to worry, "Now the camera's on me!" You're just in the place of "Well, I might be on camera right now. I better keep this reality going." It was great with Altman when we did A Prairie Home Companion, it was the same thing. There was six cameras roving around on cranes and you just never knew, so you got to live in this fantasy place about being the character all the time. It was fun. CP: I'm really interested in your next project, We Need to Talk abut Kevin [about the aftermath of a Columbine-style shooting, told via the letters of the perpetrator's mom — played by Tilda Swinton — to his dad — played by Reilly]. I'm gonna go all fangirl on you here because I loved the book and think Lynne Ramsey is straight up incredible. JR: I just finished that. We just wrapped in Connecticut a few weeks ago. It's really good. There's this guy named Ezra Miller, who plays Kevin as a teenager. Lynne struggled for awhile to get the money together, to get it set up. CP: It's not an easy project. JR: No! I said, "Lynn, I'm going to patient waiting for this to come together." You need to find an infant, a toddler, a six-year-old and a teenager. Just finding one kid who's good could take a year. But she did! She found all these kids and they look like the same person growing up. I'm really excited about that movie. I've never worked with a director that decisive before. Part of it was that we didn't have a lot of money so we had to work really tight. I can't tell you how many single takes I did on that movie. She'd be like, "Good! Check the gate!" Without even asking the DP or anybody. She has a real eye of an artist. CP: Was that in direct contrast to what the Duplass brothers were doing? JR: Yeah, it's a totally different style of working. I still improvised a little bit, and tried to give the character a little more emotional depth that was in the book. He's not quite three-dimensional in the book because it's all told through the memories of the mother. CP: I kind of thought he was an asshole in the book. JR: Yeah? Eva comes off as a little rougher. CP: No one really comes off looking good in that book. JR: What makes the movie so beautiful and so sad is that everyone is just trying their best and it's not good enough. I think the movie's going to be kind of a poem to American failure. Especially my character: He just tries and tries and tries to be the optimist with this little boy and he's not happy and he loses the battle to stick with this kid. And he just gives up. It's such a gut punch. It's one of the saddest things I've ever done. It affected me in a really deep way. Because I have kids and there are a lot of days when you feel like you're failing these kids. CP: And that's a huge sign when you've failed a child, when they go on some sort of crazy killing spree. JR: Yeah. Well, or is it? I don't know.
Posted by Molly Eichel @ 2:00 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
POSTED: Friday, June 18, 2010, 7:00 PM
Filed Under: Comedy | Interview | TV Books

As the longest-tenured correspondent on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, actress/comedian Samantha Bee's the alpha female of a pretty dude-heavy cast. Since 2003, she's regularly fake-reported, sometimes alongside husband/fellow correspondent Jason Jones, on topics from politics to religion to pornography to pop culture. But Bee's no slave to the topical. Her first book, I Know I Am, But What Are You? (Gallery), is a collection of autobiographical essays detailing her fairly ridiculous Canadian childhood, the result of being raised on one side of the family by a regimented stepmom and, on the other by a free-spirted wiccan mother.

In "Man-witch," Bee recounts her early infatuation with Jesus and her horror when her mother took her to a Wiccan ceremony: "What if I accidentally said Satan's name three times in my head? Does just thinking about Satan really invite him into your heart, or do you have to personally invite him the way you have to do with vampires?" In "May December Never Come," after an older couple mistakes her and her mother for lesbians, Bee writes: "[A]n old man had just spent three seconds imagining my mom and me doing the scissors together, and when he revealed that to us, I then spent at least three of the longest seconds of my life imagining my mom and me doing the scissors together. If you've ever had an aquarium, you know that fish can die from a disease known as 'ick,' and that's precisely how I was starting to feel." In "Gurr-Bulls," after Jones discovers an embarrassing photo from Bee's not-so-distant past, "He was looking around the room like a caged animal. I thought he might try to claw his way out through the screen door like a raccoon that gets down your chimney and ends up trapped in your house by accident. I've always suspected that one day the jig would be up. Here we have Jason, so handsome and photogenic, and his wife, by all photographic accounts homely, and, in this case, of indecipherable gender." The dozen essays reveal that the mother of two is as funny writing about herself as she is about oil spills or political impropriety. I caught up with her on the phone from her New York office in advance of her appearance at the Free Library (June 19, 2 p.m., free) and ended up talking about Patrick Stewart, Cougartown and how she and Jason totally need recommendations for their upcoming weekend in Philly. City Paper: So on a show where everyone's a senior correspondent, and that's part of the joke, you are actually the senior senior correspondent. Samantha Bee: I'm the most senior, of all the seniors. I'm like the AARP of correspondents. Although I'm not physically the oldest. I thought that I was but I'm not. Aasif [Mandvi] is actually older than me. So in your face, Aasif! CP: Does that come with any special perks? A tiara? A scepter? Do you get to sit next to Jon at staff meetings? SB: I am actually holding a scepter in one hand and having interns attend to my undercarriage as we speak. CP: Do you get more freedom with your work than, say, Wyatt [Cenac] does? SB: Nope, not at all. Does not come with any of that. I don't want it. I'm happy with the amount of freedom that I have. CP: Reading your book, it's hard not to imagine hearing these essays in your voice, with your facial expressions and your comedic quirks. SB: Well, you know, there's an audiobook, which is just the weirdest thing. I recorded the audiobook and I thought, "Who in the world would want to hear this with my voice?" I would rather I had Patrick Stewart read my book. I thought that would have been a good fit. But he's expensive. Y'know, I didn't even check. I'm sure he's way more than I can afford to pay. CP: So do you write with that intention, that these be things that could be read aloud? SB: I do. That was kind of my plan with the book. I did try to make it as casual and colloquial as possible. I did try to hear my own voice — but like a smoother sexier version of my own voice, but still, my inner voice. I tried to hear it while I wrote it. I didn't read it out loud until I recorded the audio book. So that was kind of weird, but I actually think that I achieved my goal, because when I read the audio book, none of it seemed too writey. CP: This is essentially a collection of memoirs ... SB: Y'know, I know it's technically a memoir, but I feel like I don't deserve the moniker, to be honest with you. I'm thinking more in terms of vignettes, essays from my life. Henry Kissinger writes memoirs. People who do things that are scary or valuable — they write their memoirs. I just wrote a bunch of essays, don't you think? I mean, like the book only goes up to my mid-20s. I don't really address anything I'm doing now of any value. There is no value to my book. CP: Well, it's part one. Part two will be housed in your historical library. SB: Hah, it'll be a trilogy. CP: Was there a point where you had to make a decision, basically, I'm writing a book and it's going to be about me. Because a lot of the writing you do for TV is, on some level or another, issue oriented. SB: I only wanted to write a book because I'm a narcissist, pure and simple. No, it was just the only book I wanted to write. Because I don't ... I can't even articulate why. It wasn't like I wanted to make myself look great — I obviously look like an idiot. You don't come away from the book with like a great impression of my past or anything like that. But I wanted to make it candid. And I wanted it to be funny. Hopefully, I think I achieved the candid part and we'll have to wait and see how people feel about the other part. CP: Has writing a book been on the to-do list for a while? SB: Well, yeah, it has. It's a little surreal actually. When I was growing up I always thought, "Y'know, I'm gonna write a book." And I thought, "I'm gonna live in New York." And then I forgot about both of those dreams, and really never did any work toward either of those goals. I just sort of knew it somehow. I can't really explain this. I remember definitely knowing I would do both of those things, and then never ever doing anything to make those goals happen. And it just sort of occurred. I don't like to say that I'm not in control of my own life, but some ways I wasn't, and I ended up here. And when I moved here, I went, "Heeeey, I knew I was going to live here one day." And then I wrote a book and I went, "I kneeeeew I was going to write a book." CP: Well, It's cool you were able to accomplish them both. SB: Despite my own efforts. I feel very lucky. CP: It fits with the life of leisure you say you're after in the "Sailor Moon" essay. SB: I know! I work very hard for a person who wants to lead a life of leisure. One day I'll get back there. One day I'm just going to putter around in the garden. I swear to God. CP: Are there more books in you? SB: I don't know. I definitely don't have a book in me right now — I'm about to give birth again to another child. When I wrote the book, it really hit the sweet spot. I had just given birth to my second child. It hit a sweet spot creatively and time-wise. So I think I'll wait and see how this book is received. I certainly loved the process — much more than I expected to. I didn't find it tortuous at all. I found it very enjoyable. I would love to have the opportunity to do it again. Whether anyone would give me the opportunity remains to be seen. I wouldn't do one just for my own personal pleasure, and photocopy it for my friends. CP: No vanity publishing for Samantha Bee. SB: No! CP: You've got that great essay ("Man-witch") about growing up wanting to make out with Jesus. SB: We all did. Are you a lapsed Catholic by any chance? CP: I'm a very lapsed Catholic. SB: I think that was the function of all those sexy pictures of him, wasn't it, to make all the young girls want to make out with Jesus so that we would be better Catholics? And give us a terrible secret to feel guilty about? Catholic forever. CP: He's definitely portrayed as a beefcake in a lot of those church pictures. SB: Seriously, those eyes. They just look right through you. CP: So now that you've got kids of your own, how are you planning to handle the religion question? SB: Well, that's an interesting question ... because we're choosing to pursue the path of negligence. We're just not really dealing with it at all. I'm not religious anymore. I have my own "spirituality," I suppose, but it's not really something that I could articulate for a 4-year-old. And Jason is not religious at all. So we're just not doing anything. We considered having our children baptized so that they could go to a parochial school, and get a really good education for cheaper than a private school. But that just seems dishonest. So we're not going to go down that road at all. We get questions like, "Am I going to die one day? Then what happens?" and we're just dealing with it very irresponsibly by saying things like, "I don't know" and "We're all gonna die one day," which is terrible. We're doing a terrible job, but our daughter seems to accept it right now. CP: How will you and Jason deal if your kids aren't funny? If they grow up with this, like, different religion or if they grow up and love Larry the Cable Guy? Will you have some sort of intervention like your Wiccan mother had with you? SB: I think there's no question that they're not going to be funny. They'll probably be actually very naturally funny, just because. But they'll hate it, they'll hate comedy or something, because that will be the thing that drives us the most crazy. They'll go into money management. They'll want to become accountants and not do anything creative. We have such creative hopes and expectations for them. We just want them to live and do what they love in life. And we just know they're going to pick something so square and it's just going to totally kill us. But at least they'll be able to afford to take care of us in the manner to which we have grown accustomed when we get old. So there's a plus side to it. CP: Do you have a favorite essay of the ones in the book? SB: I do have a favorite, actually. It's the one about trying to impress my sexy [college] roommate. It's called "Gurr-Bulls" because he thought that gerbils were called gurr-bulls. He was not a smart cookie, not the sharpest knife in the drawer. And I spent so long trying to impress him with my [other] roommate. Remembering all of that was just so fun for me. If he read the story, there's no way that he would make the connection between the person that I am now and the person I was then. It seems like he would be a fan of the show, but honestly I have no idea where he is now. I don't even remember his last name. I bet that he watches the show and doesn't know that he lived with me. I hope he reads the book. I don't even know that he would... no, he would recognize himself from the book, of course, but I think it would really weird him out to read it, like, "Who is this person, how did she know?" It's going to be surreal for him if he reads the book. I hope he does. He's probably doing something amazing, I'm sure he's very successful, because everything he touched turned to gold, despite himself. Everyone loved him. He was just one of those people with a golden horseshoe right up his ass. CP: The Daily Show's become a fairly formidable comedy juggernaut. It might even be starting to rival Saturday Night Live in terms of longevity and cultural significance. SB: Nice. CP: Would you agree with that? SB: I don't know, maybe. I was talking about that with Jason the other day, like what shows are history making. We were having an argument about whether or not Friends was a blip on the history of television or whether it was a monolithic show like Seinfeld. And he was saying it was a blip and I was saying no, it was very culturally significant. Love it or hate it, it was on forever, the people who were on it still get tons of work from it. Everybody knows them as those characters. And everybody got their hair cut just like Jennifer Aniston. That's not a blip. CP: And how can you talk down the show that's responsible for Cougartown? SB: The show that's responsible for the continued success of Cougartown. I don't know that any show in the history of television is anything more than a blip. Because television changes all the time. But I don't know, [The Daily Show]'s such a different show than SNL. I've loved SNL over the years, I always watch it. I can't not watch it. Because I want to be amused. ... I've always loved it. It seemed so illicit when you were a kid and your parents let you stay up to watch it, it was like a real treat. Now I think parents just let their kids watch The Daily Show, like "We're going to learn about the oil spill. Watch this." CP: The big difference is that you guys are doing it every day, or four days a week anyway. SB: I do feel there's a huge sense of pride and achievement in doing the show every day in such a quality way. And I loved The Daily Show before I came to work here, so I already had a great admiration for the show. It's surreal to be working in a place that I loved so much, and I continue to love it. And it continues to impress me in a fresh way. I think it's a great show, I'm so proud to work here. CP: Are there ever any get-togethers of the current and former correspondents? Maybe a club? SB: Ha, no, there's no clubhouse. But we do, we stay in touch a little bit. Stephen [Colbert]'s kind of off doing his own thing, but there's kinship there. I'm so happy when people go on to great success and people run into each other. Sometime we see the Corddrys when we're in L.A. and it's really nice. Actually it's so funny, Ed [Helms] is really just a lovely, lovely person, and someone here at work got caught in one of those scams, where his mailbox sent [fraudulent] e-mail that said something like, "Help, I am in distress. I am stuck here and I need money." And Ed was so adorable, he was like, "What do you need, man? Do you need me to help you?" He's so helpful and lovely. And obviously very funny. CP: How is your family reacting to their characterizations in your book? SB: They seem to really like it, they seem to be embracing it wholeheartedly, though they did not read the book before it came out. In fact, I'm so merciless, I've actually made them buy it. Isn't that awful? I have free copies, too! I have all these free copies. But it's actually kind of hard to send a book across the border, because the border guards think its pornography, so they tear it all apart. And it's good for me if people go to the book store and buy the book, of course. So my mother and father just bought copies of the book, and they're just reading it now. My step mother read it, and she really liked it. My mother, I read all the parts that pertain to my mother to her, I just wanted to get her blessing. CP: I was reading the scissoring story earlier ... SB: She doesn't shy away from these things, she's very quirky but she's also very true to herself. It is what it is. I love her. I love her. She's my mother. She's a freak. But I love her. CP: It definitely comes through. SB: And I don't think that she would ever deny that she's a bit of a freak. CP: What should we expect from the Free Library appearance? SB: I'm going to read. I like public readings. I'm starting to get into that energy. So I'm going to read and then I guess if people have questions ... they may not. I probably would field a few questions. And then I would just like to meet people and if people have something they want signed or whatever, that's fine too. But I like to meet people at these events. It's very nice. When people come to see your reading, it's kind of like a love-in. People who hate you don't come to your readings. So it's very nice to be bathed in that warmth. I'm gong to roll around on everybody. I'm going to crowd surf. Pregnant. And then somebody's going to deliver the baby. It's going to be spectacular. CP: Is Jason doing the appearances with you? SB: He's not going to any of the other cities but he is coming to Philly because neither of us know Philly very well. We've certainly been here for work a lot, but when you're working, you don't get to really explore. So we're bringing the children and we're going to spend the weekend in Philly, learning about Philly and doing fun Philly things. CP: Do you need recommendations? SB: I need a lot of recommendations. I don't know the first thing about how to have fun in Philadelphia. But I assume there is a lot of fun to be had. Samantha Bee will read from and discuss her book on Sat., June 19, 2 p.m., free, Central Library, 1901 Vine St., 215-567-4341, freelibrary.org.
Posted by Brian Howard @ 7:00 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
POSTED: Thursday, June 17, 2010, 8:40 PM
Filed Under: Comedy | Interview Stand-up
Doug Benson
In this week's issue, I told you about uber-stoner Doug Benson's stop in Philly. I chatted with Benson about, well, mostly weed. City Paper: I've been following you on Twitter and you have some ridiculous tweets. What is your most ridiculous tweet or one that has gotten the most responses from? Doug Benson: I've got HIV. But fortunately, I still get to draw four more Scrabble tiles. CP: I heard you will continue recording tour your CDs every year on 4/20 in a different city. Have you ever thought about doing one in Philadelphia? If so, what type of material would you include on it? DB: Of course. I'd love to do one in Philly. It would feature a lot of Wawa jokes. CP: Explain your creative process to me. DB: I think of things and then I say them. Process that! CP: Do you prefer to smoke weed before or after a show? If you smoke before, how does it help your performance? DB: I'd smoke during shows if I could. It makes me sillier. And that's my job, right? CP: Tell me about the first time you got high. DB: No story really. I was on the road with a couple other comics, they got me high. I liked it, and have been doing it ever since. CP: Now tell us about your worst trip. DB: I've never had a bad one. I ate too many pot brownies once and threw up in a bush. But I wouldn't call that a trip. And I blame the barfing on the alcohol. CP: What type of smoker would you say you are? Motivated, creative, straight pothead ... Think Half Baked. DB: I'm a punctual pothead, which surprises people. And then I have to wait around for them to show up. CP: Philadelphia has recently changed their marijuana laws. What are your thoughts on the decriminalization of marijuana, especially for the city of Philly? Living in California, do you own a medical marijuana license? If so, what excuse did you use to obtain it? DB: Yes, I own a medical marijuana license. And own is the right word, because you have to buy it. Not sure anybody who goes to a doctor for a medical marijuana "evaluation" gets turned away. I said I have a bad back. Which I do. But that's not the only reason I smoke weed. CP: From VH1's Best Week Ever, that you were a commentator on, which comedian is the most straight edge? DB: Michael Ian Black. I tried to get him high once and he said it didn't work. I believe him, because it was good shit. CP: What advice would you give new comedians? DB: Get your whole body in the door. Nobody would pay to see just a foot. CP: Kevin Nealon is coming to Philly in August. What do you think of him? Have you ever gotten high with Kev? Also, you should totally guest star on Weeds. DB: He doesn't get high. I should've said he was the most straight edge. And yes, I should be on that show, which means it probably won't ever happen. CP: Do you have a favorite way to get high? Other then you vaporizer from Super High Me, how big is your bong? DB: I use the vaporizer at home, and whatever people pass to me when I'm out. I don't own a working bong because they always get broken. Just like dreams.
Rufio
Posted 2010-06-17 17:14:58
Funny interview, good questions from interviewer-im liking this Rose dude.
Becca
Posted 2010-06-18 07:52:34
Haha Steve this was the perfect topic for you!
Posted by Stephen Rose @ 8:40 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
POSTED: Tuesday, June 15, 2010, 8:06 PM
Filed Under: Interview | TV
Scot Robinson and hometown hero Kate Flannery make up the Lampshades.
Who doesn't love The Office's resident alky Meredith, who can flash her cooter and be a beacon for bad parenting yet make us love her anyway? Thanks should go to Ardmore's own Kate Flannery, who plays the uber-creepy red head every week. She stops by tomorrow as one half of faux-lounge act the Lampshades, but first she called us to chat about her twin, the fightin' Phils and scrapple. City Paper: Your family owns the bar TA Flannery's (11 S. 21st St., 215-561-1193)? Will they come out to see you perform? Kate Flannery: They will. They sure will. It'll be fun. It's nice because I haven't performed in Philadelphia in a long time. They've gone to New York or they've come out here. It'll be so nice to have them actually come to the mountain rather than have the mountain come to me all the time — I have a big family. CP: I hear you have a twin sister? KF: I do, my sister Susie. She's a social worker and she works at Pennsylvania Hospital. She's very funny. CP: Is she ever mistaken for one of your characters? KF: We don't look alike but we sound alike. I feel like she does some good work. She got her Masters at Temple in Social Work and before that she worked on a reservation in New Mexico. She was really great for the kids there. I was so blown away by the work she was doing. I feel like I'm the evil twin, you know, she's the one who's doing the really good work and I'm drinking and taking off my shirt on TV! CP: So you're funny. Your sister's funny. Do you come from a funny family? KF: I do. Everybody has a really good sense of humor. I have to say the bar has always been my dad and my brother's stage. You sort of have to get a quick joke in. It's really funny. CP: Are you a Phillies fan? KF: I am a Phillies fan. I was so bummed when they didn't win this year. I was really, tragically, disappointed but you know I have to say, last year was amazing and I think we can do it again. CP: What local hotspots do you absolutely have to go to when you come home? KF: Well Hu-Nan Restaurant (47 E. Lancaster Ave., Ardmore, 610-642-3050) in Ardmore; it's a Chinese restaurant. I actually worked there when I was a kid. And I always have to go there when I'm home. And of course TA Flannery's. CP: As a child, what did you want to be when you grew up? Did you ever think you would become a beloved character on an award winning sitcom, known for being the alcoholic sexpot? KF: [Laughs] I always wanted to be an actress and I wanted to be a child star and my mother was not very cooperative, but I am very very grateful to her now because she really took care of me and protected me because what I wanted was not really all that smart. I'm glad that I got the shot later in life. I feel like it was really worth the wait. It's funny. I loved comedies as a kid, and as an adult, but I feel like it really is a dream come true to be on a show with such great fans and such a great following. You know all the actresses I know coming up through the ranks, I feel like everybody wishes for a great job. But I feel like what's even better about my job is not only is it a great show, its really a kind of love, this is really the lottery. And I'm really grateful. CP: All right well I'm going to test your love for The Office versus the Lampshades. You are stuck on a deserted island. Which character would you rather be stuck with: Dwight (Rainn Wilson) or Hori Pismo (Scot Robinson of the Lampshades)? KF: [Laughs] Wow. Well, I might pick Dwight and I'll tell you why. Hori Pismo is not very helpful. Dwight would be the bossiest pain in the neck but Dwight knows how to survive. I mean Dwight knows how to make a fire. He knows how to send a smoke signal. He knows Morse code SOS on his pager. My vote goes for Dwight. CP: You're a Philly girl. What aspect of your personality is most telling of your PA upbringing? What is the most "Philly" thing about you? KF: Wow, that's a really interesting question. I guess I can't cop out and say my ability to eat scrapple. 'Cause I do love me some scrapple. I gotta tell you, I'm very pro-scrapple. I know outsiders don't get it but I love it. [Laughs] I think my sense of humor ... maybe its because my dad had a bar and some people may have thought it was a sad place to hang out as a kid but I loved it. Maybe it's having a sense of humor about everything. I feel like Pennsylvanians are kind of tough and we're not particularly flashy or vain. It's the ability to see the whole room, to see everybody, not just the pretty people.
The Lampshades, Wed., June 16, 7 p.m., $20-$25, Helium Comedy Club, 2031 Sansom St., 215-496-9001, heliumcomedy.com.
WeCoupDeLa
Posted 2010-06-15 16:05:59
great interview, glad i took the time to read. what's up with that picture, though?!
Posted by Katy Bergen @ 8:06 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
POSTED: Tuesday, June 8, 2010, 2:00 PM
Filed Under: Interview | Music
Jamie Lidell
Soulman Jamie Lidell's Compass dropped earlier last week, and he's taking some R&R in the before launching the U.S. leg of his tour at the World Cafe tomorrow. Lidell took some time out of getting lost in the Caymans to give you some free career counseling. City Paper: I did see on your Facebook that you are having a tough time relaxing. What's the deal? Jamie Lidell: It's more a question of it being so hectic changing the band for the tour, writing the arrangements and all that. I'm the boss, and I'm feeling that sometimes, there are so many loose ends that have to get tied up all the time, but today was the good day I'm starting to really just take it easy. Right now though I'm here with the girlfriend on holiday in the Caymans, we're looking for a place to eat but like, this island is so small it's not like you just get an address and you're there, I have mostly just been turning down dark alleys and hoping for the best. CP: Where do you see creative people fitting into the industries meant to be their outlets in this sort of down economy? JL: Obviously, yeah, everyone gravitates to the live circuit controlled by major recording agents. You've got booking agents and the people controlling the industry, but at the same time there are people that just want to be creative in presenting their music. In the '90s I started making techno, people were like "What the fuck?" and we'd end up doing these parties. But, its amazing what you can do when you set your mind to it. Some of that spirit needs to come back. Finding alternate venues to the ones in the mainstream that will be booked up. Like, if the venue is making a bunch of money, you have to be making a bunch of money, your booking agency has to be making a bunch of money and chances are you're not going to get in there unless your agent is shaking hands and lalalala. You definitely have to just celebrate your independence in being able to play wherever. CP:There's definitely a line between trying to do what you want to do, and doing what you have to do. JL: Yeah there's truth in that. At the moment I've got these sudden thoughts like, "What if I go out on the road if it turns into a big shit show?" I have been trying to expand the live show lately and have ultimately been losing money because I just want to get it great. But, that's a creative decision. At the same time I'm trying to invest in the long term, the whole career. The key to it is just to believe and keep it going, if what you're doing is good it should pay off, and if it doesn't either people or stupid, or whatever. You've just got to be able to adapt to where you're at. Humans are brilliantly resourceful. Ultimately, sometimes I regret making music my career, I envy people who just like singing and don't have to worry about making ends meet with it. I've learned that you just have to stay positive about any outcome possible, and to just experience things, keep it moving and doing what feel what is right. CP: What would Jamie Lidell have been up to if he was just a shower singer ? JL: When I went to University I was thinking I was going to become a physics professor. That was my thing, music was just on the side. There's an example of what I'm talking about, my dad would have been really proud and I would have been a scientist working for a big company. But then I ended up blowing it all and being a layabout musician. I set to making something of myself doing what I wanted to do, rather than doing something someone else wants you to do. Luckily, I've never had to work for the man. In a way that's fucked me up because I get treated a certain way being a musician, I go about in a weird bubble sometimes. I hate that. I'd rather be a bloke and not think about being looked after by other people or having expectations of things and where I'm at and getting caught up with all that. Sometimes I notice that happening to me I'm like "Fuck that, I just want to be a good person." So, ultimately it's just turned out being about concentrating on being a good person, a career is just one little aspect of it. CP: You've said before that a lot of this album has good fortune and timing as central elements. What do you think about timing, immediacy, striking while the irons hot, especially given being in an industry that is completely self aware and constantly trying to brand the next big "thing"? JL: My time table of being the next big thing is over and I'm relieved. Now I'm just a career artist trying to make music that I think is good, not trying to be a supernova trying to explode onto the scene. Shifting into another phase is a conscious thing, and a lot of it is easier just being on the scene meeting great people. I have been taking advantage of that through the whole process recording Compass. Another thing about the album is that I wanted everything on my terms. Like, when I was younger it was all about collaborating with Bowie and shit, but now I'm more open minded and I've enjoyed the process a lot more. It's about maximizing where you're at and who is where. If you're in town and someone else is in town, give them a shout. Working with Beck like I did on this album, there's definitely time pressure. The guy is really busy, and the whole thing is a lot more loaded, you know like deadline pressure, expectation, make it good, do it now and that whole thing. There's something amazing that can come out of that if you're willing to jump in there with it, but it's love-hate thing, like, getting nervous versus getting it done. I worked with Matthew Herbert and he used to book mastering dates as he started a record, so you had to finish by a certain date. So he would set a really fucked deadline on himself, but he loved the pressure — that was his way. In my own way, I kind of did that with the record. Like, doing it a certain way at a certain speed moving with the characters that were helping me move. If they had a couple days, I made sure I had a couple of days, if they had a week or two, I made sure I had a week or two. That helped it all come together in a really distinct way. CP: It's like a starting off on the right foot in a really good relationship, letting things take the course they'll take and having faith that what you're doing will turn out in the end. JL: Well, yeah. It's great to travel, but it's also great to arrive. The whole album I wanted to be more spontaneous, and I'm really happy with the results. By doing it this way it's still got a lot of my central core values, messy, spirit, and all that. I put myself in it and I commit, love it or hate it, it's what I do and what I see. Once you let yourself do that, it's a really great fucked up time in terms of thinking about all the songs and just making it happen.
Wed., June 9 , 9 p.m., $25-$37, with Alex B., World Cafe Live, 3025 Walnut St., 215-222-1400
Posted by Tom Tiballi @ 2:00 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
POSTED: Wednesday, May 26, 2010, 7:35 PM
Filed Under: Interview Theater
Photo | James Haskins
Oscar-nominated actor David Strathairn has a firm grip on the role of Vilém Rieger in Vaclav Havel's first new play in 20 years, Leaving, which makes its U.S. première tonight at the Wilma. But how did he get here? Strathairn talks about the trappings of Temptation, the last Havel piece on which the actor collaborated with both the former Czech president and veteran director Jiri Zizka. City Paper: You first worked with Jiri Zizka on another Havel scripted work, Temptation. What did you think about Havel's language and ideology — and Jiri's take on it — that first go-round? How did that change with Leaving? David Strathairn: I had not been acquainted with Havel's writings before Temptation, no. It was extraordinary to read a piece as fantastical and imagined as Temptation, coming as it did from a head of state. As Jiri imagined it, Temptation was quite an Orwellian kind of Faustian exploration into what happens to those characters — much in the same way as Leaving has an intriguing cross-pollination of politics and fantastic personal reality at its heart. CP: I saw Temptation. Would you agree that Leaving has a lighter, more loving center than Temptation did? DS: Well, it's certainly not as intense as Temptation was. CP: Nor as absurd. DS: Yeah. Leaving, as we're developing it, has all the trappings of Temptation, only they're not presented with the same sort of explosiveness. We're not pushing the boundaries of reality, though the set is quite evocative and metaphysical. ... It has as wild a blend as Temptation but it's just a bit gentler. CP: This isn't your first time working with this director. What attracts you to Jiri's work? DS: He chooses potent material. The four times I worked with him — Cherry Docs and Every Good Boy Deserves Favour included — are vital and important stories and pieces of theater. They're tough to ask people to sit through. Cherry Docs in particular — he really lifted it off the paper. Every Good Boy at the Kimmel — that was quite daring to put all of us in the hands of an orchestra. His approach, at least those shows I've done him, he's well informed, there's a context for every bit of his vision. And he's detailed. He's a very complex thinker and wants to bring out as much as possible from the script and enhance it in a very theatrical manner. He's brave and conscientious and respectful of the material. CP: Is that true of the Rieger character in Leaving? DS: It was a challenge; all those references that Havel put in there and how to honor those references and make that person real as well as be respectful as to how Jiri wanted it — what tone he wanted to hear in a variety of potential tones. That character could go from very clownish to very serious. He's got quite a range for me to choose from.

Leaving runs May 26-June 20, $36-$55, Wilma Theater, 265 S. Broad St., 215-546-7824, wilmatheater.org.

Posted by A.D. Amorosi @ 7:35 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9
About this blog
Featuring everything from event roundups to concert reviews and sex talk, City Paper's Critical Mass is a space for off-the-wall coverage of Philly's A&E scene.

Follow Critical Mass editors Patrick Rapa and Emily Guendelsberger on Twitter:

@mission2denmark | @emilygee

Blog archives:
Past Archives: