When, how, and whether a neighborhood should tax itself extra: the case of Callowhill / Chinatown North

Debate is hot in the section north of Chinatown, in which some residents have called for the city's first residential neighborhood improvement tax.

email
font size
comments
2
share
options
 

When, how, and whether a neighborhood should tax itself extra: the case of Callowhill / Chinatown North

POSTED: Monday, September 19, 2011, 10:19 AM
Filed Under: News

 

 

Here's a question: when, how, and why should a neighborhood voluntarily tax itself? And what happens when not everyone in it wants to be taxed?

In this week's City Paper, I took a look at the heated debate over whether the "Callowhill" or "Chinatown North" neighborhood will become a "Neighborhood Improvement District."

While several areas around Philly have set up Business Improvement Districts, which excise a tax on local businesses and use the money for services like extra street cleaning, this would be the first one encompassing every residential address in a neighborhood, according to Center City District CEO Paul Levy, who first suggested the idea of the NID during a presentation on the viability of a park on the defunct Reading Viaduct.

A bill introduced by Councilman Frank DiCicco would impose a 7% assessment fee on almost every address in the area.(Buildings facing Broad Street, which would bring in higher assessments, have been excluded, apparently because they already belong to the Center City District — a fact which has not sit well with critics of the proposal).

My article this week focuses mostly on the divide in the neighborhood between those who favor the NID, those who don't, and those who are somewhere in between. Calling it taxation without representation, opponents worry they won't have sufficient say in the quarter million dollars collected annually — and that it represents the funding of a pet project for a vocal few: the viaduct park. Proponents say that the money is vastly insufficient to fund the building of a park and that it will be used primarily for on-the-street improvements to the blighted neighborhood.

But another interesting question is whether it makes sense for neighborhoods to tax themselves to provide themselves services that the city apparently can't. It doesn't take a long walk through the neighborhood in question to see that dumping and litter are rampant. Residents complain that streets are dark and dangerous. A quarter million dollars a year in improvements could go a long way.

On the other hand, whatever you thin of how your city taxes are being spent now, you can always (theoretically, at least) vote out of office the people spending them. The governance structure of this NID is little more confusing: a steering committee will appoint a board of directors, and members of the current active steering committee say it's open to anyone who wants to get involved.

But that's not the same as an election — and how much room there would be for dissent isn't at all clear.

City Council will hold a hearing on the bill tomorrow.

 

 

Posted by Isaiah Thompson @ 10:19 AM  Permalink | 2 comments
Comments  (2)
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 3:34 AM, 09/20/2011
    A lot of people often have a talk about cheap fake oakley sunglasses, And I am very happy to share the cheap fake oakleys in your comment, Thank you very much for you to provide me a position to tell fake oakley sunglasses to the other people, We hope every people can wear the cheap oakleys to resist the Uv Rays, Thanks. (HTML deleted)
    cheap oakleys
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 3:35 AM, 09/20/2011
    According to your article, I realized that sharing is a kind of joy and happiness, Thanks! Do you think that the fake ray ban sunglasses can protect our eyes, Friends around me say that fake ray bans can protect our fragile eyes from uv rays, And i just bought the ray ban 2132 models is especially good-looking,and very cheap, If you also have this style ? (HTML deleted)
    cheap oakleys


About this blog
Here at The Naked City, you'll find breaking news, analysis, gossip and surprises about everything from crime and politics to the beating pulse of city life itself. We're good listeners, too:

Daniel Denvir: daniel.denvir@citypaper.net

Ryan Briggs: ryan.briggs@citypaper.net

Samantha Melamed: samantha@citypaper.net

The Naked City on Twitter: @CPNakedCity @danieldenvir @rw_briggs @samanthamelamed

Topics:
Blog archives:
Past Archives: