Is Philly's five-year spending plan a fantasy?

The Web site for the award-winning alternative weekly, the Philadelphia City Paper.

email
font size
comments
0
share
options
 

Is Philly's five-year spending plan a fantasy?

POSTED: Wednesday, August 8, 2012, 12:55 PM

There's been lots of speculation recently about whether the Pennsylvania Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority will reject Philly's latest five-year plan, a forecasted operating budget for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2017. Now City Controller Alan Butkovitz says he, too, thinks the proposal should be scrapped. The problem: It doesn't take into account long-overdue pay increases for city workers who have been years without new contracts, or the raise for firefighters that the mayor is appealing despite two arbitration rulings

“There is no reasonable basis for the City to assume a favorable outcome in its appeal of the Firefighters (IAFF) award,” said Butkovitz in a statement. “There is also no reasonable basis for the City to assume that there will be no added costs resulting from ongoing negotiations with unions representing the City’s non-uniformed workers. That is why I am forced to issue an ‘Adverse Opinion’ on the City’s Five Year Plan.”

The city could owe $66 million in benefits this year if the award is upheld.

Full statement follows:

Butkovitz Calls on PICA to Reject City’s Five Year Plan
Controller issues adverse opinion based on unreasonable assumptions by City


PHILADELPHIA – City Controller Alan Butkovitz today called on the Pennsylvania Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority (PICA) to reject the City’s Five Year Plan.  As required by the PICA Act, Butkovitz examined the City’s Forecasted General Fund Statements of Operations for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2013 through June 30, 2017 (The Five Year Plan) and found that the City’s assumptions did not provide a reasonable basis for the City’s forecast.

“There is no reasonable basis for the City to assume a favorable outcome in its appeal of the Firefighters (IAFF) award,” said Butkovitz.  “There is also no reasonable basis for the City to assume that there will be no added costs resulting from ongoing negotiations with unions representing the City’s non-uniformed workers. That is why I am forced to issue an ‘Adverse Opinion’ on the City’s Five Year Plan.”

The FY13-17 Forecasted General Fund Statement of Operations is prepared by the City’s Finance Office and then submitted to PICA.

“The City has already lost two decisions on the IAFF interest arbitration award in front of the same arbitration panel, and even if they are successful on the appeal, the interest arbitration award will be remanded back to the same arbitration panel,” said Butkovitz.

“It is not reasonable to assume that the non-uniformed represented employees who have gone without raises for four years will go without a contract for another five years, especially in light of recent settlements between the City and other labor unions that have resulted in salary increases.”

“If the arbitrator’s award to the IAFF is upheld, the City is facing a benefit payment of approximately $66 million in the current year and if the ongoing negotiations with the non-uniformed workers results in agreements requiring additional retroactive wage and benefit payments, the City under the Five Year Plan as presented would lack the necessary funding to make the payment,” said Butkovitz.

In addition, other questionable forecasts and uncertainties were highlighted:
        
-The Plan overstated expenditures for debt service over the life of the Plan by approximately $90 million.
-Forecasted FY13 revenue includes a $9 million request to PICA for design work for a new Police Department headquarters, city morgue and health offices in the City’s general fund.  These expenditures should be budgeted and recorded in the City’s capital projects fund.
-The probability of additional large funding requests by the Philadelphia School District (District) in future years.  The District’s current year deficit is approximately $282 million; a staggering amount which has it on the brink of insolvency.   

“Regarding the School District’s financial situation, I want to reiterate my recommendation that the School District prepare a five year plan of its own which would require the approval of an independent authority,” said Butkovitz.

“I urge PICA to reject the City’s Five Year Plan as presented because the assumptions are not reasonable.”

To view a copy of the City Controller’s Adverse Opinion of the Forecasted General Fund Statement Operations for FY2013-FY2017, please visit the Controller’s website at www.philadelphiacontroller.org

Posted by Samantha Melamed @ 12:55 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
Comments  (0)


About this blog
Here at The Naked City, you'll find breaking news, analysis, gossip and surprises about everything from crime and politics to the beating pulse of city life itself. We're good listeners, too:

Daniel Denvir: daniel.denvir@citypaper.net

Ryan Briggs: ryan.briggs@citypaper.net

Samantha Melamed: samantha@citypaper.net

The Naked City on Twitter: @CPNakedCity @danieldenvir @rw_briggs @samanthamelamed

Topics:
Blog archives:
Past Archives: