Dept. of Deja Vu: Police account of shooting doesn't match witnesses'.

This weekend, the Daily News reported discrepancies between the police account of a shooting that left a North Philadelphia man paralyzed and the account given by witnesses - all eerily reminiscent of our recent cover story.

email
font size
comments
0
share
options
 

Dept. of Deja Vu: Police account of shooting doesn't match witnesses'.

POSTED: Monday, April 18, 2011, 2:44 AM
Filed Under: Media | News

Happy Monday!

In celebration, I'm going to share a hitherto-tightly-held journalistic secret — a magic recipe for getting a scoop no one is likely to have. Just follow these steps:

1. Wait for Philadelphia Police to shoot or kill someone.

2. Ask questions.

That's what Daily News reporter Regina Medina did this week and — lo! — she stumbled on a slew of witnesses who contradict the police account of a shooting that left a young North Philadelphia man paralyzed.

Police say the man pointed a gun at them; witnesses say the police shot him in the back as he fled.

Medina's reporting, what's more, unearthed a witness who says the police called her "a white n----- lover," and asked her "why am I living in the jungle with a bunch of n-----?"

The story reminded me of a similar experience I had, after reading a tiny blurb in the daily newspapers about a man — Air Force veteran Harry Bennett — who was fatally shot by police, also in North Philadelphia, after being tased when he allegedly brandished a "meat cleaver."

A week late to the story, I went to the scene and found several witnesses who offered a very different story than that given by police and faithfully written down un-questioned by reporters. Among the various details witnesses offered was the observation — confirmed by four people independently — that police dragged the man's body, ankles-first, down a set of concrete steps while he was either bleeding to death or already dead.

In this weekend's case, one paper seems to have talked to witnesses and the other didn't — and it shows. The Inquirer's article on the same incident is only a few paragraphs long and contains only the police account of what  happened. The DN, however, spoke to witnesses and obtained a completely different story than that offered by police.

Does that necessarily mean the police account is wrong? Of course not — but the police have a vested interest in giving simple, clean explanations. And that makes their stories worth checking. 

Posted by Isaiah Thompson @ 2:44 AM  Permalink | Post a comment
Comments  (0)


About this blog
Here at The Naked City, you'll find breaking news, analysis, gossip and surprises about everything from crime and politics to the beating pulse of city life itself. We're good listeners, too:

Daniel Denvir: daniel.denvir@citypaper.net

Ryan Briggs: ryan.briggs@citypaper.net

Samantha Melamed: samantha@citypaper.net

The Naked City on Twitter: @CPNakedCity @danieldenvir @rw_briggs @samanthamelamed

Topics:
Blog archives:
Past Archives: