State Supreme Court affirms Commonwealth Court's decision to kick Pia Varma off the ballot

The Web site for the award-winning alternative weekly, the Philadelphia City Paper.

email
font size
comments
0
share
options
 

State Supreme Court affirms Commonwealth Court's decision to kick Pia Varma off the ballot

POSTED: Friday, April 30, 2010, 6:46 PM
Filed Under: Elections
Michael T. Regan

Come May 18, denizens in the First District will be disappointed to find probably won't care or notice that there isn't a Republican on the primary ballot for the Congressional seat currently held by Bob Brady. Pia Varma, the Tea Party-friendly candidate who was attempting to square off against Brady in the general election, got kicked off the primary ballot by the Commonwealth Court for not obtaining enough signatures — but then appealed.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court's reply? "Affirmed," and that's about all. According to Ballot Access News, this decision went against precedent:

Pia Varma is the only person who tried to get on the Republican primary ballot, set for May 18, for U.S. House, First District, a district in Philadelphia. Her petition, which required 1,000 signatures of registered Republicans, was challenged because some of her signatures had been collected by registered Republicans who live outside the First District. The lower court had sustained the objection, without noting that in 2002, a U.S. District Court in the eastern district (which covers Philadelphia) had ruled it unconstitutional to require circulators to live in the same district that the candidate is running in.

...

The federal decision that had struck down the residency requirement for circulators is Morrill v Weaver, 224 F Supp 2d 882. Technically that decision struck down the residency requirement for petitions for independent candidates, not petitions for getting a candidate on a primary ballot. But the logic of one applies equally to the other.

But critics say that, though similar, the Morrill v. Weaver decision addressed different candidates than the case involving Varma, and thus the precedent didn't apply.

PREVIOUSLY>> Tea Party candidate challenging Bob Brady is kicked off the ballot

RELATED>> You Say You Want a Revolution? Tea Party doyenne Diana Reimer has big plans for you, Philadelphia.


:::Philebrity…media, culture, music and more::: » Blog Archive » Pia Varma Will Not Take No For Answer From The Party Of No
Posted 2010-05-03 12:42:45
[...] the funky fresh season-one-of-the-Real-World flava? Well, sadly (because watching this is fun), the State Supreme Court went ahead (and against precedent) and said, “Yeah, no, sorry Pia.&#82... As you can see from her Facebook post over the weekend, Pia is all like, “Pfft, [...] 
Posted by Holly Otterbein @ 6:46 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
Comments  (0)


About this blog
Here at The Naked City, you'll find breaking news, analysis, gossip and surprises about everything from crime and politics to the beating pulse of city life itself. We're good listeners, too:

Daniel Denvir: daniel.denvir@citypaper.net

Ryan Briggs: ryan.briggs@citypaper.net

Samantha Melamed: samantha@citypaper.net

The Naked City on Twitter: @CPNakedCity @danieldenvir @rw_briggs @samanthamelamed

Topics:
Blog archives:
Past Archives: