Stu gets it wrong on the bike lanes

The Web site for the award-winning alternative weekly, the Philadelphia City Paper.

0 comments

Stu gets it wrong on the bike lanes

POSTED: Thursday, September 24, 2009, 8:49 PM
Filed Under: Bikes | News | Sporting Life

Daily News columnist Stu Bykofsky – who, for the record, I like – got it wrong in his piece today on the new Center City bike lanes.

Writes Stu:

What's not good was expressed by neighborhood resident Scott Shandler, 33, walking his Boston bull terrier, Lexie, when he saw the press gaggle and asked what was happening. When he learned a full traffic lane of Pine and Spruce had been dedicated (surrendered?) to bicyclists, he said, "I don't like it at all" because "there's not enough room for everyone."

Scott Shandler's right, in a way: lack of space is a big issue, especially in Center City – but because there are too many cars.

Yeah, I know what's coming. You know where the comment section is. But for those out there who didn't blow-torch their ears shut on this issue long ago, hear me out:

You know, perfectly well, drivers – better than anyone – that traffic sucks in Center City. Parking sucks. The streets are narrow; the traffic flow is byzantine.

That's not bikes' fault – it's other cars that are holding you up, buddy. The roots of the problem are more than half a century old. In the glory days of super-cheap gas, we filled our cities with streets, highways, and cars, cars, cars. We built roads bigger and bigger to try and get the cars through them quicker – but they just kept filling up. We built interstate highways through the hearts of our cities – right through beautiful Fairmount Park in our case – and those filled up, too.

Stu complains that we've given "prime real estate" over to bikes – an absurd notion when you compare it with the valuable real estate – virtually our entire city – that we've given over to cars.

The fact that so many people have to drive every day – and no one's saying that isn't the case – is largely the result of half a century of building our cities around cars. We can't reverse those decisions overnight, but putting in a couple of bike lanes is a pretty cheap way to start – a hell of a lot cheaper than those tax-subsidized highways we've all paid for.

Being pro-bike lanes doesn't mean being anti-cars. Hell, the fewer people driving, the less traffic for you, my automotive friend.

And as for Stu's complaint – so often echoed by readers here on the Clog – that bikers behave badly:

Stu: Most of the bad bikers out there are simply inexperienced and scared. Riding in traffic is scary. You want bikes to behave more consistently? Give them a lane.

Which is exactly what we did.

Last, I hereby invite Stu to ride the lanes with me. We can start by the Delaware, end at the Schuylkill, and have some cheese and crackers and talk about it.


Department of Mind-splattering Hypocrisy: What is a full stop anyway? :: The Clog :: Blog Archive :: Philadelphia City Paper :: Philadelphia Events, Arts, Restaurants, Music, Movies, Jobs, Classifieds, Blogs
Posted 2009-11-25 14:06:48
[...] by people on the "cyclists are scofflaws" side of the urban biking argument whenever these things are hollered [...] 

Use Spellcheck
Posted 2009-09-24 16:13:56
"Stu Bykofsky: Bicyclists given too much roadway?" was the headline.

hiki
Posted 2009-09-24 16:56:56
$119.00 fine? They need to get somebody to start walking Washington Street and writing tickets. That's just wrong they haven't tapped that revenue flow.

Jesse D
Posted 2009-09-25 11:05:06
Isaiah, you hit the nail on the head.

"it's other cars that are holding you up, buddy."

Back when I had a car, drivers were a bigger headache to me than bikers ever were. Give drivers 10 lanes and they'll block all 10 where two lanes would suffice if slower traffic would keep right.

I love the bike lanes--and they're perfectly positioned in the right lane where slower traffic belongs (even if I do ride faster than a lot of cars).

patrick
Posted 2009-09-25 15:53:31
Spot-on, Isaiah. I can't believe no one has mentioned that these two streets are exactly as wide as three car lanes, so it's impossible to have a lane of parking, two driving lanes, and a bike lane. It's all or nothing for bikers-- full car-width lane or weaving in and out and being dangerously passed by irresponsible drivers. Stu wants us to have nothing, other than a certain bloody hemorrhage death at the hands of cabs.
Posted by Isaiah Thompson @ 8:49 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
0 comments
Comments  (0)


About this blog
Here at The Naked City, you'll find breaking news, analysis, gossip and surprises about everything from crime and politics to the beating pulse of city life itself. We're good listeners, too:

Daniel Denvir: daniel.denvir@citypaper.net

Ryan Briggs: ryan.briggs@citypaper.net

Samantha Melamed: samantha@citypaper.net

The Naked City on Twitter: @CPNakedCity @danieldenvir @rw_briggs @samanthamelamed

Topics:
Blog archives:
Past Archives: