Wait, someone criticized Zack Stalberg? Oh, but it's the Public Record.

Courtesy of Committee of 70

email
font size
comments
0
share
options
 

Wait, someone criticized Zack Stalberg? Oh, but it's the Public Record.

POSTED: Thursday, July 8, 2010, 8:52 PM
Filed Under: BRT | Labor | Media
Courtesy of Committee of 70

Zack Stalberg, president and CEO of good government group Committee of Seventy, has become something of a mythical Philadelphia character recently — especially after the abolishment of the Clerk of Quarter Sessions (CQS) office and the Board of Revision of Taxes, both of which the Committee has long said should be shut down. (CQS, it should be noted, isn't completely abolished yet; the First District has taken over most of its responsibilities, but City Council legislation to officially shut it down is still in committee.)

So, while we definitely take the Public Record with a grain of salt, their recent pieces criticizing Stalberg are interesting for their singularity, if nothing else. The first article takes aim at Stalberg's annual salary — the Record reports it's $248, 733 — and how he allegedly "caused a meltdown" in the CQS; the second attacks his relationship with the local real estate industry, since he advocates for the abolishment of the Sheriff's office. Sez the piece:

Nearly seven out of every 10 contributors who attended the last breakfast fundraiser in November have financial ties to the local real-estate market, or provide professional or consulting services to the public sector.

The Committee of 70 touts its “independence” from special interests on its website and takes great pride in the fact it does not seek government funds.

Yet its take from the real-estate sector raises questions, in a city where Sheriff sales have emerged as a major target for the local giants in that industry.

This has become evident with the forecast by commercial real-estate experts of a second huge wave of foreclosures and defaults which will now involve the commercial real-estate sector, including multifamily residential projects and signature buildings.

You can read the rest of the articles here, if you're so inclined. There's no dirt in the pieces, though the Record promises it, but they do leave us wondering: What does labor have against Stalberg? And does it have something to do with Johnny Doc?


Tweets that mention Wait, someone criticized Zack Stalberg? Oh, but itÂ’s the Public Record. :: The Clog :: Blog Archive :: Staff Blog :: Philadelphia City Paper -- Topsy.com
Posted 2010-07-09 12:43:51
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Committee of Seventy. Committee of Seventy said: RT @phillynewsnow: Wait, someone criticized Zack Stalberg? Oh, but itÂ’s the Public Record.: Courtesy of Committee of 70 Zack Stalber... http://bit.ly/bQMjec [...] 

Linda S. Wallace
Posted 2010-07-09 17:16:31
Once upon a time, a sheriff named John Green stood up for financially-struggling homeowners in Philadelphia. 

While other sheriff offices throughout the land added staff and scheduled extra sheriff's sales to handle the economic housing implosion, Green set up a task force as far back as 2003 to come up with ways to reduce foreclosures and sheriff's sales. (Sheriff Sales dropped 21 percent in 2005 - after changes were put into effect.)
  Green also called representatives from the national banks to Philly to talk about local constituents' complaints regarding predatory lending, predatory servicing and outright fraud. (This was back before these stories became front-page news.)
 He told them their policies were draining wealth from the city's neighborhoods and putting other homeowners in jeopardy  (The bankers would later tell Congress they didn't have a CLUE what was going on. Nobody told them)
 The renegade sheriff made the bankers with big bonuses very unhappy because all his talk - and all these rules - cost them money. (I know this because I happened to be the one who talked to these nice people on the sheriff's behalf.)
One day, a real estate developer - who had friendly relationships with banks and owned lots of houses and buildings - decides he will be sheriff for his people. Well, there was joy, again, throughout the land.

The developer contributed $100,000 to his own campaign - during the very same year the Committee of Seventy was trying hard to get money out of Philadelphia campaigns and politics. 

The voters of Philadelphia were asked to make a choice. Would they would go with the guy who was keeping an eye on the bankers and foreclosing attorneys - why yes, they would. Green was re-elected in November, 2007 with more than 96 percent of the vote.

The people's sheriff went back to his job of saving homes. But 15 months later - the Committee of Seventy - which is filling its coffers from money from banks and attorneys with real estate practices -  comes out with a report to abolish the sheriff's office.

Now for my question: If you were watching this story on TV, and it was happening in some other city - which side would you root for?

I called Zach Stalberg recently to discuss whether COS should 1) accept funds from Seventy members who have financially benefit from policies set by an appointed bank-friendly sheriff 2) Should these members recuse themselves from the decision-making process?
Mr. Stalberg declined to return my call. (Now my feelings are hurt) And he doesn't seem very anxious to explain how a non-diverse group like COS can fully represent the views and needs of an ethnically rich and economically diverse city.
My name is Linda Wallace. I am a former real estate editor at the Philadelphia Inquirer as well as the former coordinator of John Green's Task Force for Mortgage Foreclosure Prevention. 

I've decided to start telling the other side of this story on blogs throughout Philadelphia. I congratulate you for taking note of this information. 

Sometimes, the little guy (or little newspaper or singular blogger) is the first to see the hungry lion. That is why whenever I hear someone yell "help, watch out," I check it out.
If we wait until a crowd gathers and reaches a consensus before attempting to assess danger - it may be too late.
Posted by Holly Otterbein @ 8:52 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
Comments  (0)


About this blog
Here at The Naked City, you'll find breaking news, analysis, gossip and surprises about everything from crime and politics to the beating pulse of city life itself. We're good listeners, too:

Daniel Denvir: daniel.denvir@citypaper.net

Ryan Briggs: ryan.briggs@citypaper.net

Samantha Melamed: samantha@citypaper.net

The Naked City on Twitter: @CPNakedCity @danieldenvir @rw_briggs @samanthamelamed

Topics:
Blog archives:
Past Archives: