World Wildlife Fund's New 9/11 Ad: Moving or totally tasteless?

The Web site for the award-winning alternative weekly, the Philadelphia City Paper.

email
font size
comments
1
share
options
 

World Wildlife Fund's New 9/11 Ad: Moving or totally tasteless?

POSTED: Tuesday, September 1, 2009, 6:52 PM
adfreak.com
Coulda been worse?

The text at top right reads: "The tsunami killed 100 times more people than 9/11. The planet is brutally powerful. Respect it. Preserve it." (Click here for a larger version.)

David Gianatasio at adfreak.com says of this award-winning World Wildlife Fund ad: "Unfortunately, respect is the main thing lacking here. Exploiting one tragedy to try to prevent another is just stupid and self-defeating, and will always backfire."

I agree. But what are your thoughts? With the eighth anniversary of 9/11 only a week away, is it still too soon to reference the tragedy in order to get us behind a pretty unrelated cause? Or do we need this level of shock value in order to really think about big, important issues? Holler in the comments.

[UPDATE, Wednesday, 8 a.m.]: Thanks for the updates, commenters. Looks like the WWF had nothing to do with this poster, and condemns the Brazilian ad agency that used the organization's logo without their permission. Here's the statement:

"WWF strongly condemns this offensive and tasteless ad and did not authorize its production or publication. It is our understanding that it was a concept offered by an outside advertising agency in Brazil. The concept was summarily rejected by WWF and should never have seen the light of day. It is an unauthorized use of our logo and we are aggressively pursuing action to have it removed from websites where it is being currently featured. We strongly condemn the messages and the images portrayed in this ad. On behalf of WWF, here in the US and around the world, we can promise you this ad does not in any way reflect the thoughts and feelings of the people of our organization."


Drew
Posted 2009-09-01 16:17:38
That's a powerful image, I like it.

Paul Curci
Posted 2009-09-01 17:20:14
Some 40 years after seeing an image of a tear rolling down the face of an old Native American, who'd been canoeing through a trash strewn lake, and I still feel the emotion. Might even be why I never litter. Now, that's powerful creative. This? This is amateurish.... and yes, extremely tasteless. Don Draper would have taken a huge hit of bourbon, and sent these hacks back to the drawing board.

Steve
Posted 2009-09-01 19:19:25
Please update this post.  This is an unauthorized ad and WWF has issued a statement condemning it: http://www.worldwildlife.org/who/media/press/2009/WWFPresitem13540.html

David
Posted 2009-09-01 21:23:52
Hey Carolyn!  How about a little correction here???  http://www.worldwildlife.org/who/media/press/2009/WWFPresitem13540.html  Almost every media outlet has updated this story.  The WWF did NOT authorize this ad. It was a rejected spec that the ad agency submitted to a contest WITHOUT WWF's knowledge.  And before people dumbly follow up with, well, it won an award! It won a MERIT RECOGNITION.  One of seven in that subcategory alone.  There were several hundred awards given out.  Of course WWF wouldn't have found out immediately. Sheesh.  Social media FAILURE. Can you imagine how much money they've lost on this?

Bob
Posted 2009-09-01 22:02:10
Horrible. Disgusting.

sarah yoshida
Posted 2010-03-24 15:46:59
This ad is NOT horrible or disgusting! Yes, 9/11 was horrible and sad! but were the lives lost by the tsunami any less important? a loss of a life is a loss of a life and no matter how it was taken, its terrible and sad! People need to stop taking things so offensively. This ad is just trying to show people how many people were killed.
Posted by Carolyn Huckabay @ 6:52 PM  Permalink | 1 comment
Comments  (1)
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:03 PM, 12/13/2011
    I thought there was another ad that was also condemned.
    LuxuryActivist


About this blog
Here at The Naked City, you'll find breaking news, analysis, gossip and surprises about everything from crime and politics to the beating pulse of city life itself. We're good listeners, too:

Daniel Denvir: daniel.denvir@citypaper.net

Ryan Briggs: ryan.briggs@citypaper.net

Samantha Melamed: samantha@citypaper.net

The Naked City on Twitter: @CPNakedCity @danieldenvir @rw_briggs @samanthamelamed

Topics:
Blog archives:
Past Archives: