Bad Idea Factory

POSTED: Tuesday, September 14, 2010, 8:36 PM
Filed Under: Bad Idea Factory | News

UPDATE: This hearing has been cancelled. Oh well.

Press release just in from state Rep. Jennifer L. Mann, D-Lehigh:

Judiciary Committee Vote Wed., Sept. 15 on Mann's Bill to Ban Synthetic Marijuana

HARRISBURG, Sept. 14 – The House Judiciary Committee will vote tomorrow on HB 176, the Act to Ban Synthetic Marijuana, sponsored by Rep. Jennifer Mann, D-Lehigh.

The meeting will be held at 9 a.m. on Sept. 15 in Room 205 Ryan Office Bldg., State Capitol Complex, Harrisburg.

“I look forward to attending the Judiciary Committee meeting on my bill, and will urge the committee for a unanimous vote to send it to the full House for consideration,” Mann said.

“We must enact legislation banning synthetic marijuana to protect our children and get this dangerous new drug off the streets. My bill will give the police the tools they need to prosecute people who sell or use synthetic marijuana,” Mann said.

Synthetic marijuana, the most common brand called “K2,” is a blend of herbs treated with chemicals to produce a marijuana-like high in users.

The bill would ban the sale or use of synthetic marijuana, a drug responsible for numerous emergency room visits by adults and children, and even linked to deaths nationwide. Mixes of synthetic marijuana sold on the street contain various dangerous chemicals which present real health risks to users.

Its use almost always causes unwanted and dangerous side effects in its users. Due to the fact it is not a controlled substance, it is sold openly on the internet and in head shops under the names “Demon” and “Hawaiian Haze.”

Emergency rooms across the Commonwealth and country have started seeing an influx of patients who are suffering the ill effects of synthetic marijuana use. Many of the users need heavy tranquilizing to calm down. The drug can cause symptoms such as fast heart rate, confusion, nausea, agitation, anxiety, elevated blood pressure, hallucinations, and seizures in its users.

I tend to be skeptical about these almost always overwrought “think of the children” anti-drug campaigns — Slate, for instance, has done a wondrous job knocking down those “pharma party” stories that seem to pop up every now and again — but hey, the Internets tell us this stuff is bad news, so let's just assume they're correct. According to CNN:

"K2" is a brand name for a dried herbal blend that can be smoked. It produces a high similar to that of marijuana but doesn't contain tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the psychoactive chemical in marijuana. Instead, K2 contains synthetic chemicals, known as JWH-018 and JWH-073, that mimic THC by acting on the cannabinoid receptors in the brain.

JWH-018 and JWH-073 are produced in China and unregulated in the United States. Similar products have been produced and marketed under names such as Spice, Genie, Blaze, Red X Dawn and Zohai. Since 2009, the Drug Enforcement Administration has been receiving reports of the abuse of these herbal products.

K2's key ingredients were invented by Dr. John Huffman at Clemson University in 1995 during medical research on the effects of cannabinoids on the brain. He found no medical benefits -- only negative side effects. Unfortunately, marijuana users reproduced the recipe, creating a legal alternative to marijuana.

According to the Times-News, those side effects include:

rapid heart rate, confusion, nausea, agitation, anxiety, elevated blood pressure, hallucinations, and seizures

You know what doesn't cause any of those things? Actual marijuana. Just saying.


symptoms of anxiety stress | AGORAPHOBIA
Posted 2010-09-14 16:33:25
[...] The state will now come after your fake weed. [...] 
Posted by Jeffrey Billman @ 8:36 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
POSTED: Friday, May 28, 2010, 3:54 PM
Filed Under: Bad Idea Factory | News

Paperboy can say whatever he wants, but our own A.D. Amorosi has been reporting the hell out of this Greenlee and Clarke-sponsored promoters bill since the very beginning (a story he broke in Icepack and A Million Stories). In this week’s AMS, for instance, A.D. reported on the proposed legislative changes that would make the bill significantly less draconian. This morning, A.D. sends over the text of proposed amendments, which I've copied and pasted below for you to peruse (and for PW to use as a tipsheet, natch).

 

SUMMARY OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO BILL NO. 100267


ELIMINATE THE REQUIREMENT FOR A PERMIT PRIOR TO EVERY PROMOTED EVENT


The amendment will eliminate the requirement that promoters must apply for a permit from the police 30 days in advance of each event. The police will no longer have any power to approve or deny any promoted indoor event which features live entertainment


ALL PROMOTERS MUST BE REGISTERED WITH THE CITY AND HAVE A BUSINESS PRIVILEGE LICENSE

The amendment will require promoters of live entertainment to register with the Managing Director’s Office and to obtain a business privilege license. Registration should be at no cost or minimal cost and can be completed online. Registration must include full legal name, current address of record, current telephone number, current email address, current website and the promoter’s business privilege license number.


The amendment will prohibit Special Assembly Occupancy licensees from entering into contracts with unregistered promoters.


IN GENERAL, THERE WILL BE NO REQUIREMENT FOR A VENUE TO PROVIDE ADVANCE NOTICE OF PROMOTED EVENTS TO THE POLICE UNLESS A VENUE PLANS TO TURN OVER OPERATIONAL CONTROL TO AN OUTSIDE PROMOTER FOR A PARTICULAR EVENT

Whenever a venue plans to turn over operational control to an outside promoter for security, crowd control and maintaining the venue’s authorized capacity, the venue would be required to notify the police two weeks in advance so that the police will have sufficient time to redeploy its patrols.


In no case will promoters have any duty to provide any advance notice to the police.


ELIMINATE THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE VENUE AND PROMOTER PROVIDE A COPY OF A WRITTEN CONTRACT TO THE POLICE

Whenever a venue plans to turn over operational control to an outside promoter, the venue and promoter must complete a simple  form which will list which party is responsible for security, operations management during the event, crowd control and maintaining the building’s capacity


AN OUTSIDE PROMOTER WOULD ONLY BE CONSIDERED A RESPONSIBLE PARTY SUBJECT TO PENALTIES IF THE PROMOTER HAS ASSUMED OPERATIONAL CONTROL OVER SECURITY, CROWD CONTROL AND MAINTAINING THE BUILDING’S CAPACITY

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LEGISLATION WILL BE DELAYED TO ALLOW SUFFICIENT TIME TO EDUCATE


Frank Keating
Posted 2010-05-28 11:13:21
Turned out even better than I thought or heard it was going to go.

Paul
Posted 2010-05-28 14:02:22
Who or what body is responsible for these changes?

Jeffrey Billman
Posted 2010-05-28 14:16:00
Sorry for not pointing this out earlier. These come from Greenlee’s office.

umm
Posted 2010-05-30 12:54:26
umm, it's kind of a stretch to say City Paper really broke this story.

WHYY:
http://whyy.org/cms/news/government-politics/2010/04/26/philadelphia-councilman-pushes-regulations-for-club-promoters/36666

Inq (see the bottom of the article):
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/local/91889339.html

Props, though, for jumping on the story, and putting the possible effects of the bill in context.

:::Philebrity…media, culture, music and more::: » Blog Archive » Update: The Promoter’s Bill Now Only Applies To You If You Are Hiring Hell’s Angels To Do Security
Posted 2010-06-01 11:49:28
[...] a City Council first, revealed himself to be a reasonable human being), is now set to be amended. A memo from Greenlee’s office obtained by City Paper reveals the following bullet points/amendments to the bill:· ELIMINATE THE REQUIREMENT FOR A PERMIT PRIOR [...] 

Posted 2010-06-01 19:35:55
@philebrity - LOL, there are no hells angels in philly, they are ran away in 2005

Sally
Posted 2010-06-01 21:16:17
So, hey JB what do you think of this - Nancy Pelosi Says She Has a Duty to Pursue Policies in Keeping With The Values of Jesus, 'The Word Made Flesh' http://cnsnews.com/news/article/66208 http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/5444310/nancy_pelosi_takes_on_jesus_christ.html

Promoter Bill amendements to go before L&I Committee tomorrow :: The Clog :: Blog Archive :: Staff Blog :: Philadelphia City Paper
Posted 2010-06-08 12:30:41
[...] the first major set of time and date stamped changes made by Greenlee that we revealed exclusively, under this amended version of the bill, special assembly occupancies will be responsible for [...] 

State of Young Philly » Getting Through the Thick Skull of Government
Posted 2010-08-29 23:54:08
[...] wants to charge bloggers $300 for making as much as $1.  Council introduced a bill that threatened to put Philly’s nightlife scene in jeopardy.  The Mayor signed an executive order banning bikes, cupcakes, skateboards and yarn bombing.  Ok, [...] 

HALL MONITOR: We go to Council meetings so you don’t have to :: The Clog :: Blog Archive :: Staff Blog :: Philadelphia City Paper
Posted 2010-09-23 12:55:28
[...] Promoters Bill 100267-A we told you about earlier this year? (Which was pretty terrible at first, but then admittedly got better?) It's been sitting on Mayor Nutter's desk for a signature since June 17. Council passed a [...] 
Posted by Jeffrey Billman @ 3:54 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
POSTED: Tuesday, October 20, 2009, 4:32 PM
maps.google.com
Where's Waldo?

Sunday night at 8-ish, I drove around my East Passyunk neighborhood looking and looking and looking for a parking space and finally found one on the 900 block of teeny-tiny Fernon, between Tasker and Morris. This is not an unusual way to spend an evening.

The next morning, my car was gone — as were the rest of the vehicles on that block — replaced by monster street-destroying trucks, sitting there munching on the asphalt on which I'd treaded just 12 hours before.

Shit, the impound lot. I've seen Parking Wars. I don't want to go there.

So I called 311, our non-emergency info line. The busy, sorta annoyed 311 folks told me that sometimes the city "relocates" cars for paving purposes, and that if I called the Streets Department they could tell me where exactly my car was. They transferred me.

The Streets Department lady, while griping that the 311 people shouldn't have transferred me to her, was very helpful and looked up my plate number on various slow-moving computer screens till she eventually came to the conclusion that, since the relocation had just occurred, my plate probably wasn't in the system yet. I should poke around the neighborhood, and if I still can't find my car, call my local Police Department (holler, Fourth District).

So I poked. Up 10th street, down Ninth, in and out of the little streets I couldn't imagine a tow truck could even squeeze through. I even walked up and down the aisles of the Acme parking lot like a crazy person, but nada.

This morning I called the Fourth District, and the busy, sorta annoyed lady on the phone told me that the tow companies who relocate cars for paving don't record plate numbers, or where they put the cars. "It's probably in a five-block radius of where you parked it," she said. "Just look around for it, and if you don't find it, call 911."

Now, I don't really consider this an emergency emergency — I don't rely on my car, I just kinda want to, y'know, know where it is — so I'll be spending the evening combing the streets of South Philly, again, on what's starting to seem like a never-ending scavenger hunt for my silver Honda. (Which is, apparently, the same car everyone else in South Philly drives, too.)

Is this happening to other people? Is it taking you forever to actually find your relocated car? If the five-block-radius rule is true, then my car could be anywhere from Broad to Fourth, Federal to McKean. Wish me luck, and share your own relocation woes in the comments if you like.


Parking Wars: Inky catches relocation wave, finally :: The Clog :: Blog Archive :: Philadelphia City Paper :: Philadelphia Events, Arts, Restaurants, Music, Movies, Jobs, Classifieds, Blogs
Posted 2009-11-23 14:07:10
[...] really.    My South Philly-parked car was "relocated" for paving on Oct. 19. I freaked out, wrote a Clog post about the ordeal, looked for it, freaked out some more and finally found the damn thing a handful of days later, [...] 

Philly Chit Chat
Posted 2009-10-20 13:16:47
No doubt it will have several tickets on it and you will have to fight with the PPA next.

Caroline - Philadelphia Tourism
Posted 2009-10-20 14:52:32
When my neighborhood organized a 5k, the police did move cars (they had been warned). But they just moved them about 4 blocks away, to Washington. No cost to relocate.

St. Circumstance
Posted 2009-10-20 16:05:52
Although I feel for you and hope you get your car back ASAP, I have to say that there were signs posted all over Fernon St. about the Monday, 6am deadline to have cars moved off the street.  I live on the next block and was actually annoyed at the overkill of signs about the construction.  I was also annoyed at the 6:03am Monday morning wake up call of police sirens and megaphones announcing that cars were going to be towed.

carolyn huckabay
Posted 2009-10-20 16:15:45
@ Philly Chit Chat: Ugh. I hadn't even thought of that.



@ Caroline: I don't mind the relocation so much as the lack of records ... but I am relieved that, unless my car's been stolen in the interim, I won't have to pay to get it back.



@ St. Circumstance: There were signs at the other end of the block, which I saw the next morning, but none near my car. Seems like other folks on the block had missed the signs, too, since every other space was occupied. I hear you about the noise -- I heard it, too, and was annoyed. Now even more so!
Posted by Carolyn Huckabay @ 4:32 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
POSTED: Tuesday, September 1, 2009, 6:52 PM
adfreak.com
Coulda been worse?

The text at top right reads: "The tsunami killed 100 times more people than 9/11. The planet is brutally powerful. Respect it. Preserve it." (Click here for a larger version.)

David Gianatasio at adfreak.com says of this award-winning World Wildlife Fund ad: "Unfortunately, respect is the main thing lacking here. Exploiting one tragedy to try to prevent another is just stupid and self-defeating, and will always backfire."

I agree. But what are your thoughts? With the eighth anniversary of 9/11 only a week away, is it still too soon to reference the tragedy in order to get us behind a pretty unrelated cause? Or do we need this level of shock value in order to really think about big, important issues? Holler in the comments.

[UPDATE, Wednesday, 8 a.m.]: Thanks for the updates, commenters. Looks like the WWF had nothing to do with this poster, and condemns the Brazilian ad agency that used the organization's logo without their permission. Here's the statement:

"WWF strongly condemns this offensive and tasteless ad and did not authorize its production or publication. It is our understanding that it was a concept offered by an outside advertising agency in Brazil. The concept was summarily rejected by WWF and should never have seen the light of day. It is an unauthorized use of our logo and we are aggressively pursuing action to have it removed from websites where it is being currently featured. We strongly condemn the messages and the images portrayed in this ad. On behalf of WWF, here in the US and around the world, we can promise you this ad does not in any way reflect the thoughts and feelings of the people of our organization."


Drew
Posted 2009-09-01 16:17:38
That's a powerful image, I like it.

Paul Curci
Posted 2009-09-01 17:20:14
Some 40 years after seeing an image of a tear rolling down the face of an old Native American, who'd been canoeing through a trash strewn lake, and I still feel the emotion. Might even be why I never litter. Now, that's powerful creative. This? This is amateurish.... and yes, extremely tasteless. Don Draper would have taken a huge hit of bourbon, and sent these hacks back to the drawing board.

Steve
Posted 2009-09-01 19:19:25
Please update this post.  This is an unauthorized ad and WWF has issued a statement condemning it: http://www.worldwildlife.org/who/media/press/2009/WWFPresitem13540.html

David
Posted 2009-09-01 21:23:52
Hey Carolyn!  How about a little correction here???  http://www.worldwildlife.org/who/media/press/2009/WWFPresitem13540.html  Almost every media outlet has updated this story.  The WWF did NOT authorize this ad. It was a rejected spec that the ad agency submitted to a contest WITHOUT WWF's knowledge.  And before people dumbly follow up with, well, it won an award! It won a MERIT RECOGNITION.  One of seven in that subcategory alone.  There were several hundred awards given out.  Of course WWF wouldn't have found out immediately. Sheesh.  Social media FAILURE. Can you imagine how much money they've lost on this?

Bob
Posted 2009-09-01 22:02:10
Horrible. Disgusting.

sarah yoshida
Posted 2010-03-24 15:46:59
This ad is NOT horrible or disgusting! Yes, 9/11 was horrible and sad! but were the lives lost by the tsunami any less important? a loss of a life is a loss of a life and no matter how it was taken, its terrible and sad! People need to stop taking things so offensively. This ad is just trying to show people how many people were killed.
Posted by Carolyn Huckabay @ 6:52 PM  Permalink | 1 comment
POSTED: Thursday, January 29, 2009, 9:55 PM
Filed Under: Bad Idea Factory | Sex | Shopping

Damnit, UO. Now I can't buy your cute frocks.

Courtesy urbanoutfitters.com

In days past, Urban Outfitter's catalogs were somewhat classy. Yes, almost every picture was of a half-stoned girl in an extremely elegant dress emerging out of the woods. But they were usually covered up and naturally pretty, and the graphic artists decorated the page with ink drawings of bird, trees and flowers. It was wonderfully whimsical, really.

All of that went to hell in the spring 2009 catalog. Philly-based UO have ditched their respectable advertising strategy and replaced it with American Apparel's. Which it to say, they're making porn now. The new catalog is full of side-boobs, side-bums and maybe even a little side-vagina. Yes, you read the last bit right. UO is so committed to emulating American Apparel that they've one-upped their rivals and invented a new way of showing someone's privates without, 'ya know, showing them completely. Also, all of the models look 15 years old, and their despondent expressions make them appear stoned — on H, not on weed.

This sucks, because I have to boycott you now, UO. I stopped walking into American Apparel because I felt like a perv, and now you've went and done the same thing. Good riddance, side boobs.


cjmemay
Posted 2009-01-29 18:07:02
Not that boycotting works, or anything, but there are so many better reasons to boycott Urban Outfitters than side boobs. I don't even know where to start.

phillygrrl
Posted 2009-01-30 01:30:01
Do go on, cjmemay. Don't leave us in suspense...

Finchy
Posted 2009-01-30 07:57:08
I like side boobs...

Finchy
Posted 2009-01-30 08:00:31
I like side boobs! no boycott for me.....

tennessee
Posted 2009-01-30 09:47:51
It's really a shame that people are comparing UO to American Apparel, there really is no comparison. While the new catalog may show a bit more skin that usual, it is both tastefully done and beautifully executed. I feel they are taking on a more creative and artistic voice which I feel is a perfect fit and the right step in a new direction for them.

anonymousMD
Posted 2009-01-30 09:54:39
dear ms. otterbein: it is impossible to show the side of a vagina. the word you might have used, to be accurate, is vulva. the vagina, or "birth canal", is inside a woman's body and cannot be seen from the outside.

svv
Posted 2009-01-30 10:05:54
So, advertising has now become a more acceptable activity than porn? Is not the real problem the blatant commercialization of porn?

:::Philebrity…media, culture, music and more::: » Blog Archive » Rumblings: All Urban Outfitters Edition
Posted 2009-01-30 11:15:12
[...] >>> But fear not: Miraculously, URBN has not lost its edge. The new Urban Outfitters catalog contains enough sideboob to sufficiently rile the armpit hair of one City Paper contributor who’s already stopped going to American Apparel because it made her “feel like a [...]

killa bee
Posted 2009-01-30 12:17:44
those frocks make you look fat (the way you write is fat inside, regardless of how you look outside).

Paul
Posted 2009-01-30 13:24:37
Urban Outiftter's ads don't feel genuine at all. At least you get the sense that American Apparel is using them as art - controversial art - still part of a concerted expression that everybody there believes in. When you suddenly start using a young naked woman in an ad like this it feels like your pandering or just trying to get attention. If anything, that's much more offensive to women. It's saying they're just a tool you can use when you need some eyeballs. Pathetic. Either do it because you think it means something or don't do it at all. I imagine that this is why American Apparel ads strike a cord with people and nobody cares about Urban Outiftters ads.

Lucky
Posted 2009-01-30 14:53:43
Wait, let's completely ignore the fact that a large portion of UO's merchandise is stolen designs, or the fact that the founder alienates most of his customers by donating a large amount of money to the gay hating, gay bashing Rick Santorum. Yes, Holly, sideboob is the final straw. It's pathetic reporting like this article that makes the city paper a joke. It's staff is full of frivolous hipsters who cater only to their own kind.

untitled
Posted 2009-01-30 15:14:38
I thought Abercrombie and Fitch were really the modern pioneers where regular non-underwear catalogs were soft-core porn

Austin
Posted 2009-01-30 16:12:19
Oh good grief, grow up and dust the hayseed off your shoes.

VoteAudrey
Posted 2009-01-31 00:58:30
Yikes! Vitriolic comments abound! All things aside, I find it amusing that the way to market apparel is to take it off. It's like the proverbial bad pickup line: "Nice dress, it'd look better on my floor."

greg
Posted 2009-02-01 10:47:49
mmmm... side vulva.

fm
Posted 2009-02-01 13:54:42
Side-boob is a reason to look at a advertising. J O'ing and shopping simultaneously is called multi-tasking. I can save valuable time with urbn ads just as I have in the past with American Apparel.

Today’s Mission: 02.01.09 | Mission Loc@l
Posted 2009-02-02 04:25:46
[...] points out that American Apparel may have more to worry about than Mission District protesters. Urban Outfitters apparently has adopted the Los Angeles retailer’s advertising style of baring more skin than threads. Not that AA was a pioneer in that department. They simply [...]

Paul Johnson
Posted 2009-02-03 16:46:58
Sorry you feel like a perv but half my female friends feel sexier as a result

Embrace your double standard!
Posted 2009-02-03 21:35:49
I think UO's next catalog should feature a giant black raging penis, right on the cover. Oh.

Sarah
Posted 2009-02-04 00:08:22
Is it porn? Is it ripping off American Apparel? Maybe, but I don't really care about all that. The thing that irritated me most about the new catalog is that it can hardly be called a catalog. Maybe I am just crazy, but I like to look at catalogs to preview the merchandise. Most of the pictures in the "catalog" look like they have been shot by a disposable camera from 3 miles away. If the subject is shot within a reasonable distance, they are being obscured by foliage. I don't even know what they are selling in half of the pictures; the photo with the panty-less, side-boobed young lady happens to be for stockings and a duvet-cover. While trying too hard to be artsy, the catalog fails to do its main function- sell clothes.

Catalog porn makes me feel old and cranky - Both Sides of the Fence
Posted 2009-02-11 12:25:09
[...] Some 3,000 people have beat me to the punch, many of them in the last month or so.Here's what Philadelphia CityPaper blogger Holly Otterbein had to say: In days past, Urban Outfitter's catalogs were somewhat [...]

devan
Posted 2009-02-18 10:47:52
UO has made a not so subtle habit of ripping off AA's designs, so why not the ads? I admittedly am a former AA employee and it was a running joke with some of us here in the NYC stores to check and see how long it would take Urban to copy anything new that we got in. It was usually 3 weeks to a month. Shiny leggings, deep-v t-shirts, the romper, the figure skater dress, multi-colored skinny jeans, flex fleece hoodies...ALL jacked by Urban. It's kind of pathetic.

I thought City Paper was porn! « My Philadelphia Story
Posted 2009-03-07 12:22:47
[...] the Urban Outfitters catalogue today and came upon the photos that I saw in a City Paper Clog article a while back by Holly Otterbein. (Interesting how the risque half-nudes are in the middle, [...]

Ruth
Posted 2009-03-20 23:36:05
I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often. Ruth http://laptopmessengerbag.info

julia sakomo
Posted 2009-03-23 08:10:53
Excuse me, where exactly did you believe to have found porn in the abovementioned catalogs? Are you sure to understand the term porn correctly? As I have learned the hardest part of good journalism is research, be it a gaze into an up to date dictionary. I think you proove me right on that. Although, holding a PhD in psychology, I just had to stumble on this one: "I stopped walking into American Apparel because I felt like a perv […]" Could it be that your problem is not a philological one but rather the symptom of something deeper which we have terms for and therapeutic methods? Did you know that most of the problems we have with the world do not have their roots in that world but rather within ourselves? And did you know that, however, most people try to adjust the entire world to their problem instead of the other and easier way of working on themselves? regards julia

Bob
Posted 2009-07-28 11:44:52
Wow, it's amazing how much hate is generated by one person objecting to treating women like objects. Funny how women are now so "liberated" they're not allowed to have any opinion that might be considered "traditional". Open discussion is a good thing, and some people objected to the author's viewpoint with intelligent arguments of their own. Others used words like "fat" and "hayseed" and really showed their immaturity and hate. I have every right to NOT buy something for whatever reason I want, and so does everyone else. That's capitalism.

Juliet
Posted 2009-07-28 12:55:10
Right on Bob! UO is worth boycotting for many reasons. Above all, for me, is their production model - "sweat shop labor".

cheri
Posted 2010-01-07 20:43:47
I'm sorry that so many of you miss the point. Sur most models are young, but I would be surprised if the ones they are using now are older than 13. And it is soft porn. 13 year old girls posed like used lolitas that one might find on a child pron site. If you are going to hire models and pose themin risque "come and rape me" poses, then at least hire 18 year olds.

tao
Posted 2010-01-10 19:08:41
I was hoping someone would finally hit the mark- the fact that they are using CHILDREN is the issue (the only issue in my view)! Pile on top of that the fact that they are all extremely underweight --- wrong wrong wrong message to women or girls.

meganc89
Posted 2010-01-25 13:59:12
the issue here is the fact that both companies are male-dominant and the primary sex we see naked in either of the advertisements is female. go on and say that the women chose to be in the ads, but who is running to companies? men. who is choosing which advertisements get published? men. and why do women have to take their clothes off to be sexy? why does our media choose to portray women as ugly unless they have clothes off? and the fact that they are CHILDREN is even worse. go ahead, urban outfitters. start 'em young. don't worry about their dignity or safety. and another thing.. where are women who actually have curves? for anyone to achieve this body type would be completely unhealthy. this is complete sexism.

little_K
Posted 2010-01-30 13:58:56
To the person that said Urban steals AA designs, that is very wrong. Just because they have similar items, doesn't mean they were stolen. They carry what's in. Walk into any similar store and you'll find similar items. I highly doubt that AA sets the fashion trend for what's in. It's like saying H&M jacked AA for carrying v-knecks and rompers. All stores carry those items now, they copy trends. As for the Urban spring ad, their always weird on their catalogues. I don't see the big deal, it's just a catalogue. It's not like AA's annoying porn ads that pop-up on websites. Also, what's the point of "boycotting" a store? They are still going to get business, it's not going to stop anyone from going there and handing their money over. It's really stupid to say that your going to "boycott" a store.

Jesse D
Posted 2010-02-01 12:57:25
So, American Apparel is the one designer that Urban doesn't steal designs from? BTW, why is the door at Urban always propped open? Born in a barn? Heating/cooling the great outdoors? Thanks for contributing to global warming, Urban.

Tara Seeley
Posted 2010-02-02 15:31:44
We just received yet another UO catalog, which I am calling "Lolita gets dressed up." As a mother of teenagers (boys and a girl) I find the whole thing disturbing--as your first responder said, "where do I even start..." Its the ads as porn, its the stoned look, its the relentless marketing to teens...
Posted by Holly Otterbein @ 9:55 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
About this blog
Here at The Naked City, you'll find breaking news, analysis, gossip and surprises about everything from crime and politics to the beating pulse of city life itself. We're good listeners, too:

Daniel Denvir: daniel.denvir@citypaper.net

Ryan Briggs: ryan.briggs@citypaper.net

Samantha Melamed: samantha@citypaper.net

The Naked City on Twitter: @CPNakedCity @danieldenvir @rw_briggs @samanthamelamed

Topics:
Blog archives:
Past Archives: