Criminal Justice System

POSTED: Wednesday, February 16, 2011, 7:34 PM

An attorney representing 20-year-old George Spain had gone through an exhaustive final argument: Spain was up for murder one in courtroom 707 of the Criminal Justice Center on Monday afternoon. The sentence could land him in prison for the rest of his life and his attorney, Dennis Cogan, had explained the case in clear and uncertain terms:

Reginald James, Jr., 19, was shot and killed around 8:30 p.m. on Feb. 18, 2009 as he fled two assailants near a dark street corner in Germantown. Later than night, James’ girlfriend identified Spain and another man to police. They were taken into custody. The other man was released, however – and two new suspects came under scrutiny – after Spain supposedly told police what had really happened.

According to Cogan, Spain said two men -- Tyreese Copper and his father, Gregory Anderson (known as “Little Ty” and “Big Ty”) -- had targeted James Jr. because he had stolen a lockbox from them.

The Commonwealth wanted the jury to believe, Cogan said, that Spain had known about the planned murder, conspired to execute it, and then snitched to police to avoid implicating himself. This would make Spain liable for murder as an accomplice.

Cogan dismissed these notions outright – and a host of others – in just over an hour: Without Spain, Cogan said, the police had no case. “He sets it right!” Cogan said.

After the defense rested, it was John Doyle’s turn. Representing the District Attorney’s office, he said Spain had been “blowing up” Little Ty’s cell phone in the minutes leading up to the murder. Spain knew the plan, he worked with Big Ty and Little Ty to corner James Jr., and Spain should be sent to prison for life.

Doyle rested and then Judge Stephen R. Geroff outlined the jury’s options: convicting Spain of murder one would land the 20-year-old in prison for life. Murder three would earn him a maximum of 40 years in prison. And if the jury found Spain not guilty, well, he would be sent home. It’s now up to the jury.

After less than two hours, the court’s clerk announces that the jury has come to a verdict. Family members here to support both Spain and the deceased James Jr. fill the courtroom. Eight officers from the sheriff’s department enter to keep things as calm as possible, standing on the courtroom’s edge with their revolvers tucked away, their walkie-talkies off and their hands folded stalwartly in front of their belt buckles. The room is quiet; there’s almost no sound but for occasional whispering and rustling clothes. The judge enters. The clerk asks that no one react to the verdict once it’s read. There are bated breaths and pregnant sighs. The jury enters – one at a time – and they sit. Another pause. The clerk reads the first count:

On murder in the first degree, how do you find the defendant, George Spain?

The jury foreman looks at the courtroom and demurs.

“Not guilty your honor,” he says. The courtroom stirs.

Murder in the third degree?

“Not guilty your honor.”

And on the conspiracy charge?

“Not guilty your honor.”

The room does, in fact, react. There are cries of joy and sadness from both sides of the room. Police officers, who testified for the prosecution and are now sitting in plainclothes in the front row of the court gallery, sit with arms crossed, visibly angry. They refuse to comment. A woman related to James Jr., who asks not to be identified, says the verdict “just ain’t fair” before breaking into tears.

And on the other side of the room – where Spain’s family now begins to exit – there are tears of jubilation. Donald Smith, Spain’s uncle, has tears rolling down his face when he says, “justice has finally been done today.”

But has it?

“The unfortunate thing about all this is that someone is dead,” says attorney Gary Silver, who worked with Cogan’s team on this case. “And not only are the guys who committed this murder still out there, but you had Spain sitting behind bars for two years waiting for trial.”

“It feels like everyone loses,” he says.

UPDATE: Tyreese Copper is, in fact, in lock up and is being prosecuted for murder; his trial is set for September (see this PDF of his docket sheet). His father, however, has not yet been arrested for this crime.

Posted by Matt Stroud @ 7:34 PM  Permalink | 1 comment
POSTED: Wednesday, February 9, 2011, 5:45 PM

Not exactly Philly-centric, but definitely a big deal: A Luzerne County judge who allegedly agreed to take kickbacks from the builder of a juvenile detention center in exchange for sending kids into lockup is on trial today.

The case initially involved two judges -- Mark. A. Ciavarella Jr. and Michael Conahan -- who pleaded guilty to illegally accepting millions in cash in exchange wrongfully sentencing potentially thousands of kids to serve time in lockup between 2003 and 2008. The Pa. Supreme Court -- working from a petition brought forward by Philadelphia's Juvenile Law Center -- expunged some 6,000 sentences handed down by the judges. The Luzerne County juvenile justice system, in other words, collapsed.

Both judges initially pled guilty to the kickback scheme. Conahan has stuck with that plea and could face 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine but Ciavarella instead decided to stand trial. Those proceedings began Tuesday in Scranton's Federal courthouse.

Citizen's Voice in Wilkes-Barre is providing coverage by the hour and the Associated Press reports today (via the Atlanta Journal Constitution) that the juvenile detention center's builder testified to the judge's involvement:

Robert Mericle testified Wednesday at the trial of former Luzerne County Judge Mark Ciavarella (shiv-uh-REL'-uh). Prosecutors say Ciavarella was part of a $2.8 million "kids for cash" scheme in which he locked up juvenile offenders at detention facilities Mericle built.

Mericle told the court that he visited Ciavarella in his courthouse office and said he wouldn't have had the opportunity to build the facilities without Ciavarella. Mericle testified that Ciavarella agreed he should be paid as a result.

Meanwhile, the Standard Speaker in Hazelton, Pa. reports that court employees who worked for Ciavarella Jr. and Conahan are now being implicated as well.

The New York Times adds interesting coverage as well as audio interviews with some of the wrongfully sentenced kids. The Wall Street Journal's "Law Blog" has a summary of the case with a few useful links.

Not included in those links, however, is the link to the report by the Interbranch Commission on Juvenile Justice -- which in based on Market Street in Center City Philadelphia and was formed by the Pa. General Assembly with the sole purpose of finding out what happened in this case and how it can be avoided in the future. That report is here in PDF form. Among its conclusions:

The collapse of the juvenile justice system in Luzerne County carries with it sad lessons. Most important, the experience demonstrates what happens when judicial power is divorced from the constraints of law, when slogans such as “zero tolerance” masquerade as thoughtful philosophy, and when judicial courage and compassion are replaced with a self-serving cunning.


Notes from the Weekend: Feb. 14 | Alaska Fresh Salmon
Posted 2011-02-14 21:32:04
[...] • ‘Cash for kids’ case back in court; key witness says Luzerne judge agreed to be paid... [...] 
Posted by Matt Stroud @ 5:45 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
POSTED: Wednesday, February 2, 2011, 5:34 PM

A judge this morning sentenced Catherine and Herbert Schaible to 10 years probation in the accidental death of their two year old son.

The couple, who are lifelong members of the First Century Gospel Church in northeast Philadelphia, have seven other children. The Schaibles were convicted of involuntary manslaughter and endangering the welfare of a child in December after prosecutors say they failed to take their infant son to a doctor when he showed signs of the flu. Instead they prayed and their son, Kent, soon died of pneumonia.

Several undated sermons on the First Century Gospel Church's website speak directly about the church's opposition to doctors and medicine.

"Our life must be committed to God without compromise, and our will is to be His will in everything," according to one sermon. "That commitment to God means we are to trust God alone for physical healing without the use of medicine, drugs, prescriptions, human remedies, or a doctor."

Senior Common Pleas Judge Carolyn Engel Temin said "it's obvious a prison sentence is not called for" and that "everything I've heard about you is complimentary with the exception of this incident." She stressed, however, that "religious freedom is trumped by the safety and well-being of the child."

The terms of their probation require the couple to schedule regular in-person meetings with probation officers for two years, followed by three years of regular phone meetings and then five years of non-reporting probation. Part of this sentence requires that the Schaibles schedule regular medical appointments for all their children and release their children's medical records to probation officers.

"I need to give a sentence that's long enough to ensure the kids have adequate healthcare until they turn 18," judge Engel Temin said.


Cold Sore Freedom In 3 Days – Most Beneficial Remedy For Cold Sores | BestCureHemorrhoids.info
Posted 2011-02-04 22:34:00
[...] Faith-healing couple sentenced to 10 years probation :: The Clog … [...] 

Peyote Church | Orkuthru Tribal Art
Posted 2011-02-03 14:53:04
[...] use of entheogens, like Ayahuasca, is found in many healing traditions, most readily indigenous cultures that use psychoactives as a tool to promote various [...] 

Tweets that mention Faith-healing couple sentenced to 10 years probation :: The Clog :: Blog Archive :: Staff Blog :: Philadelphia City Paper -- Topsy.com
Posted 2011-02-02 17:56:01
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Blue Wode, scott_hurst, Campbell Fuller, dennis borowski, Dan J and others. Dan J said: Probation. Really? >> Faith-healing couple sentenced to 10 years probation http://bit.ly/hF3XfR [...] 

mattand
Posted 2011-02-02 13:15:16
Wow. These people should be in jail for at least a minimum of 20 years. They killed their own child by mumbling nonsense over him instead of getting him to an actual doctor.

What's amazing is that in 21st century, 40 years after man walked on the moon, a good chunk of American society still believes that things like prayer and alternative medicine work. One step forward, eight steps back.

infidelity in marriage: When Your Lover Is a Liar: Healing the Wounds of Deception and Betrayal | infidelity in marriage
Posted 2011-02-11 19:03:31
[...] Faith-healing couple sentenced t&#959 10 years probation :: Th&#1077 Clog … [...] 

Notes from the Weekend: Feb. 14 | Alaska Fresh Salmon
Posted 2011-02-14 21:28:16
[...] • Faith-healing couple sentenced to 10 years probation [...] 
Posted by Matt Stroud @ 5:34 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
POSTED: Monday, October 4, 2010, 7:53 PM

I can't vouch for the credibility of WalletPop or Neighborhood Scout or the methodology they're using, but I'll pass this along, anyway:

For the second year in a row, using exclusive data developed by Dr. Andrew Schiller's team at NeighborhoodScout.com, and based on FBI data from all 17,000 local law enforcement agencies, WalletPop reveals the top 25 most dangerous neighborhoods with the highest predicted rates of violent crime in America.

No. 1 is a hood in Chicago. No. 2, Cleveland. Nos. 3 and 4 (and 8), Las Vegas (who knew?). No. 5, the ATL.

And then there's No. 6: North 13th Street, or more specifically, the area bounded by Green Street to the south, Poplar to the north, Broad Street to the west, and 10th Street to the east. According to NeighborhoodScout, this 'hood has a median home value of $101, 973; according to WallePop, you have a 1 in 9 shot (pun unintentional) of being a victim of violent crime here in a year. (That's compared to a 1 in 19 shot citywide, which, let's be honest, is still a bit frightening.) Other thing worth noting: 92 percent of the nation's school districts are rated as being better than ours.

Yikes.

Missing? The Badlands, which has either cleaned up its act (relatively speaking) — and is now less dangerous than No. 25, a neighborhood in my old home of Orlando called Parramore (which is, unsurprisingly if you're familiar with how these things are done in the south, a mostly black neighborhood named after a Confederate general) — or WalletPop just overlooked it.


brendancalling
Posted 2010-10-04 15:50:24
that's kinda interesting.  I've been at 12th and Green every tuesday night at a bar called the institute for the past 4 months or so and have never seen anything remotely scary.

Joel
Posted 2010-10-04 16:02:23
I was in a bike accident last year on 12th and Brown and the neighbors there were very friendly and caring. They helped me up and even called an ambulance. However I had to leave my bike there overnight. When I came back the next morning, after just one night!, it had been completely ransacked for parts

vincent
Posted 2010-10-04 23:20:22
surprised the area northwest of temple isn't listed

craig
Posted 2010-10-12 20:10:19
that is absurd. there is no way in hell that that area is nearly as bad as almst any block in the "badlands". total bullshit. whoever made this list must be referencing some faulty statistics, or just talking directly out of their own ass. just go to sommerset and any of the lettered streets. it's like a ghost town, with junky apparitions floating up and down the streets like plastic bags on a windy day. the only people in sight are either copping or selling dope, and when that sun sets on that narcotic wonderland, gun shots ring out like satans dinerbell. vegas? i'm sure theres a place like that in nevada, right next to the field of money tress and the office for free health care

Patrick
Posted 2010-10-13 12:16:14
This owes to the PHA housing sites in the area, managed out of John F. Street Community Center at 11th & Poplar -- Richard Allen & Cambridge Mall.  

Obviously this isn't one of the most dangerous neighborhoods in Philadelphia, but if the neighborhood list was compiled using federal crime statistics serious home crimes like manufacturing of drugs et al. are much more likely to be represented in a 'slum' with management than without.  Methodologies used for these sorts of analysis (apples & oranges) are almost always flawed.
Posted by Jeffrey Billman @ 7:53 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
POSTED: Friday, August 6, 2010, 12:29 AM
Filed Under: Criminal Justice System | News

The Juvenile Lifer debate hit City Hall Wednesday morning, and you're not missing much if all you've read on the subject is our reports over the past year. Yesterday's House Judiciary Committee public hearing, held in City Hall's chamber room, broached — as advocates and lawyers and crime victims and, most recently, the Supreme Court have broached for decades — the propriety of sentencing a minor to life without parole.

(For the purposes of the argument, a “minor” is “someone who commits a crime while under the age of 18.” The phrase “juvenile life without parole” is too clunky and therefore regularly shortened to “JLWOP,” pronounced “jail-wop.”)

Pennsylvania has more juvenile lifers than any other state in the country — about 400 — and that stat gets repeated ad nauseum when you attend these kinds of meetings.

The hearing yesterday came in response to the House Bill 1999, introduced by Rep. Kenyatta Johnson, D-Phila., which would abolish JLWOP and give all juvenile offenders, even murderers, a shot at parole after 15 years. Under current state law, there are only two sentencing options for minors convicted of homicides: sentencing as a juvenile (rare) and given freedom at 21, or sentenced as an adult, and given freedom never. Johnson's bill would give some wiggle room to judges and prosecutors: If someone turned out to be a Satan incarnate (hello, Charles Manson), parole boards could turn them down, and they'd stay in prison for the rest of their lives. But at least they'd have a chance to redeem themselves.

Yesterday's meeting was covered sufficiently enough by the Daily News and the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. Both reporters focused — as daily newspaper reporters are wont to do — on both sides of the JLWOP argument:

1) “Kids are different,” as Bradley Bridge wrote in his appeal for the longest-serving inmate in Pennsylvania's correctional system, Joseph Ligon, now 73. This side implies that minors are not mature enough — emotionally or psychologically — to be held accountable for adult prison sentences.

2) “So what?” Victims of violent crimes — and the families of crime victims — are still victims whether the person who committed the violent crime was a kid or not.

Those sides don't get at the complexity of the JLWOP issue in Pennsylvania, obviously. For one thing, Pennsylvania subscribes to the “felony murder rule,” meaning that if someone is killed in the commission of a felony, everyone involved in the felony is eligible for a mandatory sentence of life without the possibility of parole — whether or not the homicide was intended, and whether or not a person or group of people pulled the trigger or not. (Party to a drug deal gone bad? Life for you, mister.)

That's just one aspect. In fact, I'm not even scratching the surface. It's probably worthwhile to look over some of the testimonies given to the House Judiciary Committee, posted below. They give some incredible depth of perspective: from victims who have incurred heartbreaking sadness at the hands of violent kids, to advocates who work with men who are growing into middle age in prison because they made stupid decisions while they were in junior high or high school.

Worth a look:

From the Office of the Victim Advocate (against HB 1999)

From the Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth (for HB 1999)

From the Pennsylvania District Attorney's Association (against):

From Don Romig (against):

From Cully Stimson (against):

From Bradley Bridge (who did not testify, but is for HB1999):

From Anita Colon (for )

From Alyce C. Thompson

From Carol Lavery (against)

From Juandalynn Taylor (for)

From The Sentencing Project (for)

From the Juvenile Law Center (for)

From the Pennsylvania Prison Society (for)

From the National Organization of Victims of Juvenile Lifers (against)

From Dottie Moquin (HB1999)


Bobbi
Posted 2010-08-06 12:47:11
Thank you Matt,

 For covering all the different aspects of the hearings. There is no doubt there is a great deal of pain and suffering on both the victim and offender's family in these situations. Any changes that are made, should include all of the positions that Representative Johnson invited to the hearings.

Annette Van zant
Posted 2010-08-05 21:42:20
Juvenile lifers should receive a chance to redeem themselves. I am tired of my tax dollars going to programs and institutions which do not work. Prisioning juvenile to Life has NOT deterred crime. For HB 1999

Posted 2010-10-21 22:51:38
How about punishing the ones who have committed crimes. Sure, we would want people to be afraid of committing crimes because they see others incarcerated. But there are always those who do not care and commit crimes. Best to keep the ones already incarcerated than to put them out in the streets where you say others continue to commit crimes. Keep as many off the streets as possible.
Posted by Matt Stroud @ 12:29 AM  Permalink | Post a comment
POSTED: Thursday, November 19, 2009, 8:53 PM

Don't know if you saw this little thingamajigger on Phawker, (which itself links to this thing from Washington City Paper), but our Police Commissioner may have a truthiness problem from his days down in DC. From the WashCP:

An affidavit filed today in U.S. District Court raises questions as to whether former D.C. Police Chief Charles H. Ramsey may have committed perjury in his sworn testimony about the Pershing Park fiasco. Ramsey had repeatedly stated in depositions that he had not ordered the mass arrest of approximately 400 people during the Sept. 27, 2002, World Bank/IMF protests.

Yet the affidavit, by Det. Paul Hustler, a 22-year D.C. Police veteran, maintains that Ramsey indeed ordered the arrests.

Hustler's affidavit, taken Nov. 16, [PDF] is just the latest shock in a pair of Pershing Park class-action civil suits in U.S. District Court. In recent months, the case has been dogged by allegations of massive discovery violations. Judge Emmet Sullivan has called for an outside investigation into how basic evidence in the cases had gone missing.

We took a quick read through Hustler‘s testimony, and indeed, if he’s telling the truth, it might not bode well for Chief Ramsey. So, being the judicious reporters that we are, we (technically, an intern) placed a call to Ramsey’s public affairs office, to ask if he had any thoughts on Hustler’s statement. Here's what the lady who answered the phone told us, in whole:

"We're not willing to comment, and neither is he!” Click.

So, um, there you go.


Woodward
Posted 2009-11-19 18:39:20
great reporting
Posted by Jeffrey Billman @ 8:53 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
About this blog
Here at The Naked City, you'll find breaking news, analysis, gossip and surprises about everything from crime and politics to the beating pulse of city life itself. We're good listeners, too:

Daniel Denvir: daniel.denvir@citypaper.net

Ryan Briggs: ryan.briggs@citypaper.net

Samantha Melamed: samantha@citypaper.net

The Naked City on Twitter: @CPNakedCity @danieldenvir @rw_briggs @samanthamelamed

Topics:
Blog archives:
Past Archives: