Prisons

POSTED: Thursday, August 5, 2010, 1:33 AM
Filed Under: Prisons

Ed. note: In this week's ballbuster of a cover story, CP contributor Matt Stroud tackles the allegedly horrific conditions inside the solitary confinement wing of the State Correctional Institution at Dallas, out near Wilkes-Barre, which, according to a lawsuit and written statements from a number of inmates, may have driven one severely mentally ill man to commit suicide. It's a good read, and you should check it out. On Monday, Stroud headed out to a state House Judiciary Committee hearing on solitary confinement in Yeadon, and filed this report.

The Pa. House Judiciary Committee held a public hearing Monday in Yeadon, a suburb just southwest of Baltimore Avenue in West Philly, and the topic was solitary confinement. State Rep. Ronald Waters, D-Phila./Delaware County, announced during his opening remarks that his primary objective was to speak with prison officials and former inmates about how prisoners are treated during their stays in solitary confinement, and to understand more about why some prisoners end up spending years in the hole, while others end up being released from the prison system — and into the general public — after serving long periods of time in potentially psychically disturbing isolation.

“I want to know who we're sending back to the streets,” Waters said.

The speakers were Michael Klopotoski, Deputy Secretary of the Pennsylvania Dept. of Correction's (DOC) Eastern Region (and former superintendent of SCI Dallas, the prison examined in this week's cover story); William DiMasico, executive director of the Pennsylvania Prison Society; Nathaniel Lee and LuQman Abdullah, who spoke as former prisoners who had experienced solitary confinement; and Bret Grote, an investigator with the Human Rights Coalition.

Klopotoski said DOC is “committed to maintaining a safe and secure prison system for both the offender population and DOC staff.” He explained DOC's solitary confinement policy at length — and the different circumstances that can land a prisoner in the hole — and concluded that while it costs the state about 16 percent more to incarcerate a person in solitary confinement than it does to incarcerate them in general population (the state pays about $31,000 per year to incarcerate an inmate), that price is worthwhile because solitary confinement is “necessary to ensure our prisons are safe and secure for the public's safety and for the safety of the offender population … as well as the staff that work in our prisons.”

Most of the 30 or so in attendance were either related to people currently incarcerated, affiliated with civil rights groups working to abolish solitary confinement or former inmates who had done time in the hole. Thus, it's not entirely surprising that Klopotoski received a unified scoff from the crowd when he ended his statement with, “It is my hope through the testimony offered today that the myths and misconceptions associated with specialized housing units have been dispelled.”

The other speakers read from prepared statements, arguing that policy doesn't necessarily dictate actions — but the most telling interactions were unscripted.

After Klopotoski spoke, for example, Waters took issue with Klopotoski's insistence that, while all grievances against correctional officers (COs) in solitary confinement are investigated, many of those grievances are “frivolous” and crafted to unfairly tar COs. Waters spotted a problem with DOC's handling these complaints: Because inmates are confined between and 23 and 24 hours per day alone in a concrete cell, they need to rely on corrections officers to file their grievances.

“The person who's being complained about now has to turn over the complaint against himself,” Waters pointed out.

Klopotoski replied that this wasn't a problem at all, because inmates can drop their grievances in a specific mailbox meant specifically for filing grievances against COs or other staff. They can do this when they're walking to take a shower three times per week, Klopotoski said, or when they're on their way to the exercise yard. A man sitting next to me — a former inmate who did not want to be quoted — countered that two COs generally escort inmates to showers and the yard, and that dropping a grievance into one of these special grievance boxes in their presence often invited further harassment.

Waters didn't go there; instead, he drifted toward the idea that if these grievance boxes were ever used, then certainly at least a handful of COs must have been removed from their position — or at the very least disciplined — as a result of the accusations. “How many officers are removed as a result of these grievances?” Waters asked.

“To my knowledge there may have been a few, minimal — but that isn't really a good practice to get yourself involved with, because if offenders know they can get a certain officer removed by filing an abundance of grievances, then offenders might be encouraged to file a number of false or frivolous grievances,” Klopotoski replied.

“I'm trying to picture it as though I'm in the hole,” Waters responded. “If someone is treating me fairly and treating me humanely, that's not a person I would want to be removed from their position. I would probably have a problem with someone who was not treating me fairly and not treating me humanely.”

Waters did not ask for a response; Klopotoski did not give one.


?I want to know who we’re sending back to the streets:? A state House … – Philadelphia Citypaper (blog) « Housing Bubble News
Posted 2010-08-04 20:50:47
[...] ?I want to know who we're sending back to the streets:? A state House …Philadelphia Citypaper (blog)…    Comments (0) [...] 
Posted by Matt Stroud @ 1:33 AM  Permalink | Post a comment
POSTED: Friday, May 21, 2010, 9:27 PM
Filed Under: Prisons
Courtesy of North Escambia

In this week's A Million Stories, we told you about the recent report on Philadelphia's jails put out by the Pew Charitable Trusts:

Good news, Philadelphia: After a decade of our  prison population going up, up, up, it finally, magically, went down. From January 2009 to now, the average daily count dropped from 9,787 to 8,306  — which is still way overcrowded (the city spends 7 cents of every tax dollar on jails, in fact), but hey, a little less so!

There was only one problem: The city hadn't a clue what happened, until the Pew Charitable Trusts conducted a yearlong study of the prisons. Turns out, the answer has little to do with the city itself, but rather, a 2008 Pennsylvania law requiring that inmates serving between two- and five-year sentences be sent to state prisons instead of local lockups.

You can stop patting yourself on the back now, Mayor Nutter.

At a panel discussion hosted by Pew on May 19, the mayor did indeed pat himself on the back — quite a bit — saying that the population was "down … certainly not by accident" and that there were plenty of "things we're doing here to drive down the prison population." Deputy Mayor for Public Safety Everett Gillison concurred, claiming that the state law only accounted for about 300 of the 1,500 fewer prisoners in 2010, as compared to 2009. (The Pew report notes that fewer arrests and changes in the Philadelphia Adult Probation and Parole Department were also factors in the decreased jail population.)

Gillison says his ultimate goal is to be able to shut down an entire jail — indeed, that's where the real savings will come from — and that he only needs "1,000 fewer inmates" to do it. The panel, which included Gillison, District Attorney Seth Williams, Rev. Ernest McNear and Vera Institute of Justice director Michael Jacobson, discussed several possible ways to further reduce the jail population: relying less on cash bail, updating and following the bail guidelines, more day reporting centers, more diversion programs, etc. However, the discussion kept coming back to this: What if you let out the wrong 1,000 people? Or, more to the point, what if you let out just one person who kills a cop, while the other 999 freed people hurt no one?

Williams put it this way: "I don't know if the public cares if the prison population goes up or down," noting that safety is people's main concern.

And with that in mind, it's hard to tell what, if anything, will be done to further reduce the jail population.

You can download the report in full here.


etaples-sur-mer
Posted 2010-05-22 14:53:08
Well, the hole in the City budget should get that jail figure down nicely.  Nutter was so busy spending $12,500,000.00 to clear the way for Pew's Barnes Move that there will be a lot less money for police protection & public safety.  Thanks Pew. (P.S. Pew why don't you concentrate on Marine Life & NOAA instead of screwing up The Barnes in Merion?)
Posted by Holly Otterbein @ 9:27 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
1  |  2
About this blog
Here at The Naked City, you'll find breaking news, analysis, gossip and surprises about everything from crime and politics to the beating pulse of city life itself. We're good listeners, too:

Daniel Denvir: daniel.denvir@citypaper.net

Ryan Briggs: ryan.briggs@citypaper.net

Samantha Melamed: samantha@citypaper.net

The Naked City on Twitter: @CPNakedCity @danieldenvir @rw_briggs @samanthamelamed

Topics:
Blog archives:
Past Archives: