Archive: January, 2009

POSTED: Friday, January 30, 2009, 8:45 PM
Filed Under: Greenstorming | News
greenoptimistic.com

For a while there, it looked like Philly was poised to become the Eastern capital of wind power. In 2004, PECO gave citizens the option of purchasing wind energy to power their homes and businesses. Two years later, Gamesa, the second-largest maker of wind turbines in the world, opened three manufacturing facilities in Bucks County. And then the city really got serious about wind power — by involving its beloved football team. Last year, the Eagles announced that wind energy would power its training complex and Lincoln Financial Field.

Unfortunately, the region's wind industry has reached a roadblock. This month, Gamesa said that it will close its blade-manufacturing branch in Bucks County, laying off 184 workers. The branch will relocate to western Pennsylvania, where there is more physical space to make larger blades. The Philadelphia region can't really compete with that. But, as Hamida Kinge reported in Next American City, Gamesa faces another problem:

“We have lost a generation of skills in this country because manufacturing has been shipped overseas,” says Peck, “and we now need to retrain our people in key manufacturing areas to keep up with the renewable energy sector.” In the past, Gamesa has had to send some of its green-collar workers to Spain for training.

The good news is that Bucks County seems to be on top of this:

Now, “Bucks County Community College is our primary source of training,” Peck says. The college performs on-the-job and technical training and is currently putting together a professional development program for the company’s management team.

But is that enough to keep Gamesa here? If President Obama keeps his word on doubling the country's use of renewable energy, then wind power will certainly play a role in that. Here's hoping that Philly will, too.

Posted by Holly Otterbein @ 8:45 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
POSTED: Thursday, January 29, 2009, 9:55 PM
Filed Under: Bad Idea Factory | Sex | Shopping

Damnit, UO. Now I can't buy your cute frocks.

Courtesy urbanoutfitters.com

In days past, Urban Outfitter's catalogs were somewhat classy. Yes, almost every picture was of a half-stoned girl in an extremely elegant dress emerging out of the woods. But they were usually covered up and naturally pretty, and the graphic artists decorated the page with ink drawings of bird, trees and flowers. It was wonderfully whimsical, really.

All of that went to hell in the spring 2009 catalog. Philly-based UO have ditched their respectable advertising strategy and replaced it with American Apparel's. Which it to say, they're making porn now. The new catalog is full of side-boobs, side-bums and maybe even a little side-vagina. Yes, you read the last bit right. UO is so committed to emulating American Apparel that they've one-upped their rivals and invented a new way of showing someone's privates without, 'ya know, showing them completely. Also, all of the models look 15 years old, and their despondent expressions make them appear stoned — on H, not on weed.

This sucks, because I have to boycott you now, UO. I stopped walking into American Apparel because I felt like a perv, and now you've went and done the same thing. Good riddance, side boobs.


cjmemay
Posted 2009-01-29 18:07:02
Not that boycotting works, or anything, but there are so many better reasons to boycott Urban Outfitters than side boobs. I don't even know where to start.

phillygrrl
Posted 2009-01-30 01:30:01
Do go on, cjmemay. Don't leave us in suspense...

Finchy
Posted 2009-01-30 07:57:08
I like side boobs...

Finchy
Posted 2009-01-30 08:00:31
I like side boobs! no boycott for me.....

tennessee
Posted 2009-01-30 09:47:51
It's really a shame that people are comparing UO to American Apparel, there really is no comparison. While the new catalog may show a bit more skin that usual, it is both tastefully done and beautifully executed. I feel they are taking on a more creative and artistic voice which I feel is a perfect fit and the right step in a new direction for them.

anonymousMD
Posted 2009-01-30 09:54:39
dear ms. otterbein: it is impossible to show the side of a vagina. the word you might have used, to be accurate, is vulva. the vagina, or "birth canal", is inside a woman's body and cannot be seen from the outside.

svv
Posted 2009-01-30 10:05:54
So, advertising has now become a more acceptable activity than porn? Is not the real problem the blatant commercialization of porn?

:::Philebrity…media, culture, music and more::: » Blog Archive » Rumblings: All Urban Outfitters Edition
Posted 2009-01-30 11:15:12
[...] >>> But fear not: Miraculously, URBN has not lost its edge. The new Urban Outfitters catalog contains enough sideboob to sufficiently rile the armpit hair of one City Paper contributor who’s already stopped going to American Apparel because it made her “feel like a [...]

killa bee
Posted 2009-01-30 12:17:44
those frocks make you look fat (the way you write is fat inside, regardless of how you look outside).

Paul
Posted 2009-01-30 13:24:37
Urban Outiftter's ads don't feel genuine at all. At least you get the sense that American Apparel is using them as art - controversial art - still part of a concerted expression that everybody there believes in. When you suddenly start using a young naked woman in an ad like this it feels like your pandering or just trying to get attention. If anything, that's much more offensive to women. It's saying they're just a tool you can use when you need some eyeballs. Pathetic. Either do it because you think it means something or don't do it at all. I imagine that this is why American Apparel ads strike a cord with people and nobody cares about Urban Outiftters ads.

Lucky
Posted 2009-01-30 14:53:43
Wait, let's completely ignore the fact that a large portion of UO's merchandise is stolen designs, or the fact that the founder alienates most of his customers by donating a large amount of money to the gay hating, gay bashing Rick Santorum. Yes, Holly, sideboob is the final straw. It's pathetic reporting like this article that makes the city paper a joke. It's staff is full of frivolous hipsters who cater only to their own kind.

untitled
Posted 2009-01-30 15:14:38
I thought Abercrombie and Fitch were really the modern pioneers where regular non-underwear catalogs were soft-core porn

Austin
Posted 2009-01-30 16:12:19
Oh good grief, grow up and dust the hayseed off your shoes.

VoteAudrey
Posted 2009-01-31 00:58:30
Yikes! Vitriolic comments abound! All things aside, I find it amusing that the way to market apparel is to take it off. It's like the proverbial bad pickup line: "Nice dress, it'd look better on my floor."

greg
Posted 2009-02-01 10:47:49
mmmm... side vulva.

fm
Posted 2009-02-01 13:54:42
Side-boob is a reason to look at a advertising. J O'ing and shopping simultaneously is called multi-tasking. I can save valuable time with urbn ads just as I have in the past with American Apparel.

Today’s Mission: 02.01.09 | Mission Loc@l
Posted 2009-02-02 04:25:46
[...] points out that American Apparel may have more to worry about than Mission District protesters. Urban Outfitters apparently has adopted the Los Angeles retailer’s advertising style of baring more skin than threads. Not that AA was a pioneer in that department. They simply [...]

Paul Johnson
Posted 2009-02-03 16:46:58
Sorry you feel like a perv but half my female friends feel sexier as a result

Embrace your double standard!
Posted 2009-02-03 21:35:49
I think UO's next catalog should feature a giant black raging penis, right on the cover. Oh.

Sarah
Posted 2009-02-04 00:08:22
Is it porn? Is it ripping off American Apparel? Maybe, but I don't really care about all that. The thing that irritated me most about the new catalog is that it can hardly be called a catalog. Maybe I am just crazy, but I like to look at catalogs to preview the merchandise. Most of the pictures in the "catalog" look like they have been shot by a disposable camera from 3 miles away. If the subject is shot within a reasonable distance, they are being obscured by foliage. I don't even know what they are selling in half of the pictures; the photo with the panty-less, side-boobed young lady happens to be for stockings and a duvet-cover. While trying too hard to be artsy, the catalog fails to do its main function- sell clothes.

Catalog porn makes me feel old and cranky - Both Sides of the Fence
Posted 2009-02-11 12:25:09
[...] Some 3,000 people have beat me to the punch, many of them in the last month or so.Here's what Philadelphia CityPaper blogger Holly Otterbein had to say: In days past, Urban Outfitter's catalogs were somewhat [...]

devan
Posted 2009-02-18 10:47:52
UO has made a not so subtle habit of ripping off AA's designs, so why not the ads? I admittedly am a former AA employee and it was a running joke with some of us here in the NYC stores to check and see how long it would take Urban to copy anything new that we got in. It was usually 3 weeks to a month. Shiny leggings, deep-v t-shirts, the romper, the figure skater dress, multi-colored skinny jeans, flex fleece hoodies...ALL jacked by Urban. It's kind of pathetic.

I thought City Paper was porn! « My Philadelphia Story
Posted 2009-03-07 12:22:47
[...] the Urban Outfitters catalogue today and came upon the photos that I saw in a City Paper Clog article a while back by Holly Otterbein. (Interesting how the risque half-nudes are in the middle, [...]

Ruth
Posted 2009-03-20 23:36:05
I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often. Ruth http://laptopmessengerbag.info

julia sakomo
Posted 2009-03-23 08:10:53
Excuse me, where exactly did you believe to have found porn in the abovementioned catalogs? Are you sure to understand the term porn correctly? As I have learned the hardest part of good journalism is research, be it a gaze into an up to date dictionary. I think you proove me right on that. Although, holding a PhD in psychology, I just had to stumble on this one: "I stopped walking into American Apparel because I felt like a perv […]" Could it be that your problem is not a philological one but rather the symptom of something deeper which we have terms for and therapeutic methods? Did you know that most of the problems we have with the world do not have their roots in that world but rather within ourselves? And did you know that, however, most people try to adjust the entire world to their problem instead of the other and easier way of working on themselves? regards julia

Bob
Posted 2009-07-28 11:44:52
Wow, it's amazing how much hate is generated by one person objecting to treating women like objects. Funny how women are now so "liberated" they're not allowed to have any opinion that might be considered "traditional". Open discussion is a good thing, and some people objected to the author's viewpoint with intelligent arguments of their own. Others used words like "fat" and "hayseed" and really showed their immaturity and hate. I have every right to NOT buy something for whatever reason I want, and so does everyone else. That's capitalism.

Juliet
Posted 2009-07-28 12:55:10
Right on Bob! UO is worth boycotting for many reasons. Above all, for me, is their production model - "sweat shop labor".

cheri
Posted 2010-01-07 20:43:47
I'm sorry that so many of you miss the point. Sur most models are young, but I would be surprised if the ones they are using now are older than 13. And it is soft porn. 13 year old girls posed like used lolitas that one might find on a child pron site. If you are going to hire models and pose themin risque "come and rape me" poses, then at least hire 18 year olds.

tao
Posted 2010-01-10 19:08:41
I was hoping someone would finally hit the mark- the fact that they are using CHILDREN is the issue (the only issue in my view)! Pile on top of that the fact that they are all extremely underweight --- wrong wrong wrong message to women or girls.

meganc89
Posted 2010-01-25 13:59:12
the issue here is the fact that both companies are male-dominant and the primary sex we see naked in either of the advertisements is female. go on and say that the women chose to be in the ads, but who is running to companies? men. who is choosing which advertisements get published? men. and why do women have to take their clothes off to be sexy? why does our media choose to portray women as ugly unless they have clothes off? and the fact that they are CHILDREN is even worse. go ahead, urban outfitters. start 'em young. don't worry about their dignity or safety. and another thing.. where are women who actually have curves? for anyone to achieve this body type would be completely unhealthy. this is complete sexism.

little_K
Posted 2010-01-30 13:58:56
To the person that said Urban steals AA designs, that is very wrong. Just because they have similar items, doesn't mean they were stolen. They carry what's in. Walk into any similar store and you'll find similar items. I highly doubt that AA sets the fashion trend for what's in. It's like saying H&M jacked AA for carrying v-knecks and rompers. All stores carry those items now, they copy trends. As for the Urban spring ad, their always weird on their catalogues. I don't see the big deal, it's just a catalogue. It's not like AA's annoying porn ads that pop-up on websites. Also, what's the point of "boycotting" a store? They are still going to get business, it's not going to stop anyone from going there and handing their money over. It's really stupid to say that your going to "boycott" a store.

Jesse D
Posted 2010-02-01 12:57:25
So, American Apparel is the one designer that Urban doesn't steal designs from? BTW, why is the door at Urban always propped open? Born in a barn? Heating/cooling the great outdoors? Thanks for contributing to global warming, Urban.

Tara Seeley
Posted 2010-02-02 15:31:44
We just received yet another UO catalog, which I am calling "Lolita gets dressed up." As a mother of teenagers (boys and a girl) I find the whole thing disturbing--as your first responder said, "where do I even start..." Its the ads as porn, its the stoned look, its the relentless marketing to teens...
Posted by Holly Otterbein @ 9:55 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
POSTED: Wednesday, January 28, 2009, 4:41 PM
Filed Under: The City Paper

We've got some explaining to do. Last month, the Arts Agenda section vanished from the paper. It didn't even leave a note. At the same time, the listings for galleries, museums, readings/book signings and performing arts suddenly started appearing in the Agenda section.

So what gives? Arts Agenda and Agenda got married. (Actually, I guess you'd call it "eloping," since they did it slyly.) It makes sense if you think about it — before, it was unclear why there was both an Arts section and an Arts Agenda section. Now there's only one. And besides, they didn't even have to change last names when they got married.

But I'm done anthropomorphizing newspaper sections. The important point here is that there are often fewer listings in the print version of City Paper than before. Sometimes you may not see "Adults, etc." or "Volunteers" in print — but they will always, always be available online at citypaper.net/agenda_search. I thought that most people knew about our online listings, but then I got inundated with e-mails from people who thought we had flushed them down the toilet. We haven't, so please let your friends who aren't Internet heads know: They'll always be alive and well right here on the Web.


:::Philebrity…media, culture, music and more::: » Blog Archive » Things That Aren’t In The Paper Anymore: Listings, Horoscopes, (Articles, Ads, Relevance)
Posted 2009-02-02 15:10:03
[...] laid off some folks as well (most under-reported local media story in recent memory, natch). CP is gutting their listings sections willy-nilly, and PW oughta give up the ghost on that one entirely. There’s not even any Brezny up in this [...]
Posted by Holly Otterbein @ 4:41 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
POSTED: Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 11:36 PM
Filed Under: Night Moves

Don't know what to do tonight? Don't worry, we've got you covered.

Yes, this is the second literary Night Move this week. But c'mon, that's what depressingly cold winter nights are for — schlepping out of your house to read a book with strangers, even though you could do the exact same thing by yourself at home. (Don't worry, the social interaction is good for your SAD.) Tonight, author Azar Nafisi will be reading from her new book, "Things I've Been Silent About." Unlike her previous work, "Reading Lolita in Tehran," this one is personal. She talks about her troubled parents, family secrets and exploring her sexuality through literature. Hopefully the last bit will keep us warm enough to walk home afterwards.

Tue, Jan. 27, 7:30-9pm, free , Free Library, Central Branch, 1901 Vine St., 215-567-4341.


Jesse D
Posted 2009-01-28 11:19:35
Great tip. Would have been more helpful if posted more than an hour before the event.

Get Lit: Win a copy of Thomas Glave’s The Torturer’s Wife :: The Clog :: Blog Archive :: Philadelphia City Paper :: Philadelphia Arts, Restaurants, Music, Movies, Jobs, Classifieds, Blogs
Posted 2009-02-04 15:00:00
[...] categories Arts, Get Lit City Lights, 262 pp.,$15.95, Feb. 1Some of our Clog readers piss and moan that we don't give enough lead time on our previews. We like to think that y'all's attention spans [...]
Posted by Holly Otterbein @ 11:36 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
POSTED: Monday, January 26, 2009, 10:00 PM
Filed Under: Night Moves
Not dead yet!
Courtesy myfoxphilly.cityvoter.com

Don't know what to do tonight? Don't worry, we've got you covered.

Remember when Robin's Bookstore died? Well, like a way cooler Jesus, it's been resurrected. Experience denial, anger, depression and finally acceptance with fellow customers at the second night of Robin's transition party, which celebrates (and grieves) it moving to the second floor of its old store. Now called Moonstone Arts Center, it still holds literary events and sells bargain books. Tonight, Sam & Monica will present live music and spoken word, and Jan Beatty will read from her new book, "Red Sugar." Her poetry explores her fascinating past, which includes working as an abortion counselor, waitress, welfare caseworker, and in maximum-security prisons. And you thought your job was bad.

Mon., Jan. 26, 6 p.m., free, Moonstone Arts Center, 110A S. 13th Street, second floor, 215-735-9600, robinsbookstore.com

Posted by Holly Otterbein @ 10:00 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
POSTED: Thursday, January 22, 2009, 5:44 PM
Filed Under: Comedy | Sex

Another reason to hate Max: Doing this
made him rich.

I understand why Tucker Max hit it big on the Internet. That's where hateful, base speech like his flourishes —  read any forum discussion, and you'll see a million Tucker Maxes talking about how stupid women are and how cool butt sex is. In that way, Tucker Max is the Joe Sixpack of the Internet. He's commonplace. Almost normative and boring, even.

But now Max has left the Internet and entered your local, cozy bookstore. He'll be reading from his book, I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell, at Wynewood's Borders (80 E. Wynnewood Road) at 6 p.m. tonight. You shouldn't go. Or better yet, you should go and heckle him. Let's review why:

He filmed himself having sex with a woman without telling her:

This was going to be my first time foraging in the ass forest, and I wanted to have a reminder of my trip, a memento I could carry with me the rest of my life...so I decided to film us.

I planned this beforehand, but I was afraid she would decline, so instead of being mature and discussing this with Jaime, I just made the executive decision to get it on camera...without telling her.

That alone is pretty bad. But instead of just setting up a hidden camera...I got my friend to hide in my closet and film it.

He preys on people who are emotionally damaged. And gets off on it:

So let's see...beautiful girl, been judged on her beauty all her life, depressed about being rejected from her life goal, completely lost her focus...does anyone else see where this is going?

He's written about more despicable things, but I don't want to dirty up the Clog with too much Tucker Max. Basically, he's the worst human alive. And he knows it:

My name is Tucker Max, and I am an asshole.

I get excessively drunk at inappropriate times, disregard social norms, indulge every whim, ignore the consequences of my actions, mock idiots and posers, sleep with more women than is safe or reasonable, and just generally act like a raging dickhead.

Yep, he's an asshole's asshole. The kind that knows he's atrocious, and is proud of it. I hope that a rich helicopter Mom from Wynnewood overhears his reading in Borders and sues him for emotionally damaging her child. Or just vomits on him. I hear he's touchy about that.


jeffery
Posted 2009-01-22 15:55:02
http://tuckermaxdoucebag.blogspot.com/

jeffery
Posted 2009-01-22 15:58:05
Yes--Tucker Max is a douchebag, and Viacom's stock price is paying the price: http://tuckermaxdoucebag.blogspot.com/ http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=VIA-B#chart1:symbol=via-b;range=2y;indicator=volume;charttype=line;crosshair=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=on;source=undefined

bryanslist
Posted 2009-01-22 17:11:41
Wow Holly, where do I even start? How about I just pop in there on my way down to the city tonight and take a thumbs up picture with him to send to you? This is the first piece of your's that I've read and I know nothing about you and the tone in which you write, so I may be out on a limb with my interpretations to start off, but is maybe all of your rage directed at Tucker just masking the sadness you feel because some string of guys like Tucker never much took a fancy with to special uniqueness? Putting aside the fact that he went to two impossibly difficult to gain entrance higher learning institutions, he is a great writer and with his skill, he adds POSITIVE value to 1000's of young men's lives with humor, sensationalism and the openness to let other's vicariously live his life. My father doesn't talk very much, but he has a strange knack for semi-prophetic statements when he does. One example of which was that "any 'asshole' can tell you how much something sucks, but that it takes a real special person to look at that situation and find a way to take some good out of it." God bless.

Antnee Dimeo
Posted 2009-01-22 17:16:17
Yes, Tucker Max is bad man who does bad things and hurts people. He should be punished. Why don't we all sue him?

Dirk
Posted 2009-01-22 17:41:27
Tucker Max? I wasn't aware that he was still around. He was an Internet celeb about 4 years ago, but then faded after he was exposed as a liar on the Opie & Anthony radio show. Unlike the fabricated Tucker Max within his stories, the real Tucker Max is rather dull, and doesn't have a witty comeback after his interviewers call him a liar. You can look up the YOUTUBE of the interview. You'll change your mind about Tucker. He's an Internet bully, but in real life he's just a socially retarded dweeb.

Rick Derris
Posted 2009-01-23 00:07:23
Bryan: if you think Tucker is a great writer, then I'd hate to see who you think is a poor writer. The guy is a hack and every person who has been to college knows someone who (1) can tell stories better than him and (2) also MAKES UP better stories than him. The fact that people don't like Tucker Max has NOTHING to do with jealousy. Why should I be jealous of a big-chinned douchebag like him? And he dated The Bunny, who is an ugly disgusting ho-bag. Yup, I'm really jealous.

paul
Posted 2009-01-23 09:53:36
http://gawker.com/5124568/your-tucker-max-movie-update "Remember brotastic internet niche figure Tucker Max and his objectively awful movie script? Where the hell is that flick, huh? Here, your full update on I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell, the movie:"

Donna
Posted 2009-01-23 10:22:46
I went- whether or not he's a "good" writer, his stories are entertaining and enjoyable. I think his book is a fun read. I blogged about it- check it out at the link I gave.

Leslie
Posted 2009-01-23 13:22:38
Tucker's blog is pretty pathetic. I'm positive 90% of the guys there are high school kids. I guess it's amusing if you're a boy who plays video games after school, and don't get out that much.

Donna
Posted 2009-01-23 15:37:06
BTW gang-- no reading. It was just a signing.

Meeg
Posted 2009-01-23 16:21:50
I don't know what's worse that his book was a NYTimes best seller or that they're making it into a movie (Yeah I do, the best seller thing).

j
Posted 2009-01-24 13:50:09
I think the amount of ire he generates from various people on the internet makes me want to like, or at least tolerate, the guy even more. People here and on other sites talk about Tucker like he kills babies. Men are acting like him and doing what he does en masse around the country. There are a lot more things for you to be angry about, if thats your thing. A guy who graduated from good schools to go on to write and book and make a movie isn't at the top of my list for internet hatred, even if the stuff he did is deplorable I could hardly care enough to hate him for it.

sta
Posted 2009-01-27 07:16:15
what do the schools he graduated from have to do with anything? he got kicked out of law school and never became a lawyer, and its not like he went to harvard. he went to university of chicaco. scary top 30 brains on big tucker. and he doesn't kill babies, but his hackneyed, unfunny, douchebag rape humor kills souls.

stanley
Posted 2009-01-27 18:01:05
i am so glad i went to duke and u of c because i now know what "ire" means. it is sooo easy to get into duke and u of c. look at all the douchebags--tucker's freinds--who went on to kill fannie/freddie/bear/lehman/merill/bofa/citi and america. they killed america and left us with douche instead. stanley. http://tuckermaxdoucebag.blogspot.com/

Posted 2009-02-18 11:40:52
Tucker Max is Awesome. Fuck all ya'll who hate....

Brian Howard
Posted 2009-02-18 14:59:14
You think Tucker's awesome but are too ashamed to use your real name? Brave post, anonymous. We all salute you.

anthony dimeo sucks
Posted 2010-10-30 14:16:04
hahahah i hate antnee dimeo with a passion. he is a sexist pig who lies about his whole business. i kno this first hand. do not buy from him.
Posted by Holly Otterbein @ 5:44 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
POSTED: Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 10:19 PM
Filed Under: Music | television | Comedy | Sex
I'm totally straight for FotC!

If you appreciate honesty over flattery for example, being told that you're pretty enough to be a waitress (but definitely not the prettiest girl in the world) then you'll dig relationship advice from the leading men of Flight of the Conchords.

Will Bret and Jemaine tell you that your boyfriend's ugly and you should dump him for a New Zealander? Most likely. When you ask them if you should wear that cute new sweater on your first date, will they say "No, 'cause you just look OK in it, girl?" Yep. But isn't that the raw, honest truth you've been looking for?

Send in your burning questions to askaconchord@bust.com by Sun., Jan. 25, and read the answers in BUST Magazine's April/May issue. Just don't expect anything sugar-coated.


phillygrrl
Posted 2009-01-21 22:46:08
The answer to your first question is "No."

Dani
Posted 2009-01-22 10:58:17
i think that the premire episode was okay. the really only good things about it was when Murray started to sing in that opera voice, i started to laugh, and the ending with the chior in the sky. otherwise it was pretty meh. last season was amazing. i hope that the premire episode doesn't reflect what the rest of the season will be like. but the answer to your first question is possibly, and the answer to your second question is yes.
Posted by Holly Otterbein @ 10:19 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
POSTED: Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 9:13 PM
Filed Under: The CLOG
Posted by Holly Otterbein @ 9:13 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
POSTED: Monday, January 19, 2009, 5:40 PM
Filed Under: Media | President Obama | Web Junk

CNN, take heed: Kids make terrible interviewees. I don't have anything against them (OK, maybe I think they're a little lazy), but c'mon. Did you really have to talk to little Victor about how he gave Prez-elect Obama a fist jab at 30th Street Station? Did you expect him to say anything other than "It was fun?" I especially hate how Wolf Blitzer is all, "We have a very special guest today." Yes, he's special simply because he's 5 years old! Ugh. OK, wait. I just watched the part where he's talking about the fist jab again. It's kind of adorable that he's taking back that gesture. Damn cute liberal kids.


Phillybits
Posted 2009-01-19 18:12:15
Terrorist fist-bumps?! Someone call Michelle Malkin! There's a certain little 5 year old, it seems, who may need to be subjected to some "enhanced interrogation" to determine the extent of his relationship with B. Hussein Obama. And while she's at it, perhaps Malkin can go dumpster diving in his parents trash to see what kind of links they have to known terrorist organizations.
Posted by Holly Otterbein @ 5:40 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
POSTED: Friday, January 16, 2009, 10:51 PM
Filed Under: Music | 10-track mind

Every week, we have a staffer, freelancer or friend/enemy/frienemy of The Clog put their iTunes or iPod on shuffle and tell us about the first 10 songs that come up. The only rules: No skipping, no cheating and you don’t need to be all music critic-y about it. (If you’d like to submit a 10-Track Mind of your own, contact Drew Lazor at drew.lazor @ citypaper.net.) This week, listings editor Holly Otterbein stops working long enough to temporarily treat her ears nice.

1. Woody Guthrie –  “New Found Land” (Columbia River Collection)
I have my snobby friends to thank for this one. I’d want to rock out to the jangly, metallic-y and unarguably brilliant Blonde on Blonde, and they’d hate on it. “Screw Bob Dylan,” they’d say. “He’s just a ripoff of Woody Guthrie.” It turns out this is only half-true, applying to a measly six of Dylan’s 32 studio albums. But I’m glad I got to know Guthrie because of it. He’s wholly American and makes for great roadtrip music.

2. Radiohead – “Kid A” (Kid A)
A friend of mine once said that this album captures our zeitgeist. And that’s all I’m going to say, because otherwise I’ll sound like a slobbering fangirl.

3. The Decemberists – “Yankee Bayonet (I Will Be Home Then)” (The Crane Wife)
This album, The Crane Wife, is based off an an old, bittersweet Japanese tale. (Read about its fantastical plot here.) It’s epic and involves soldiers and lovers, just like every great Decemberists album. By the way,  I never heard of the term “lit-rock” before The Decemberists came around. Did it exist before them? Surely another band must like the thesaurus as much as The Decemberists do.



4. Broken Social Scene – “Tremoloa Debut” (Broken Social Scene)
This one-minute ditty makes me think of the word “longing.”

5. Wilco – “When You Wake Up Feeling Old” (Summerteeth)
Damn, this 10-Track Mind makes me look pretty indie, huh? Well, whatever. My excuse is that I just started using iTunes. As for this Wilco song, it’s a little more cheerful than I like my Jeff Tweedy. I’m a bigger fan of Yankee Hotel Foxtrot and all its depressing, neurotic melodies. 

6. Joni Mitchell – “River” (Blue)
Joni’s schtick is insecurity — her lyrics, voice and  stage prescense all reek of it — and this is especially true in “River.” In the line, “I’m so hard to handle/I’m selfish and I’m sad,” you can actually hear her pouting. (Listen for it in the words beginning with “s.”) But damn if it isn’t the most beautiful whining I’ve ever heard. Thank God for Joni’s failed love affairs. We wouldn’t have gems like these without ’em.

7. Neutral Milk Hotel – “Two-Headed Boy” (In the Aeroplane Over the Sea)

Where did Neutral Milk Hotel go? Why won’t they come back and write more wildy abstract, dramatic songs that make me want to roll in a field all day?

8. Notorious B.I.G. — “Warning" (Ready to Die)
Now here’s a song that speaks to who I really am, unlike all those indie songs. Kidding. But I do love Big Poppa.

9. The Fugees — “Family Business” (The Score)
A beautiful, complex rap about immortality and crime. Isn’t it cool that Prez-elect Obama said he digs this group?

10. Cat Power – “The Greatest” (The Greatest)
Chan Marshall is so damn wry. She names her album “The Greatest,” which makes it sound like an prideful recap of her 15-year ouvre, and then puts completely new songs on it! Songs about how she once wanted to be the greatest, but then realized that goal was futile! Well, at least her dilemmas make for bluesy, soulful jams. I can’t say the same about mine.

Posted by Holly Otterbein @ 10:51 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
1  |  2
About this blog
Here at The Naked City, you'll find breaking news, analysis, gossip and surprises about everything from crime and politics to the beating pulse of city life itself. We're good listeners, too:

Daniel Denvir: daniel.denvir@citypaper.net

Ryan Briggs: ryan.briggs@citypaper.net

Samantha Melamed: samantha@citypaper.net

The Naked City on Twitter: @CPNakedCity @danieldenvir @rw_briggs @samanthamelamed

Topics:
Blog archives:
Past Archives: